| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2009/08/07 07:51:59
Subject: Exploding your own vehicle by ramming can the troops fire from inside?
|
|
Long-Range Ultramarine Land Speeder Pilot
Probably somewhere I shouldn't be
|
The Dragon wrote:the other 'may not' discussion as I'm sort of stewing on it here means you can not actively 'decide' to disembark of your own free will after turbo. IF you get snuffed the guys just fall out on the table going WTF.
Yep, must trumps may not.
|
40k:    WHFB:  (I want a WE Icon, dammit!)
DR:80S+G+M(GD)B++I++Pw40k96+D+A+++/areWD206R+++T(M)DM+
Please stop by and check out my current P&M Blog: Space Wolves Wolf Lord |
|
|
 |
|
2009/08/07 09:11:47
Subject: Exploding your own vehicle by ramming can the troops fire from inside?
|
|
Bounding Assault Marine
|
yeah sure except, *shrugs* it doesn't actually use the word 'must'... it simply says that ON a result of 5 it disembarks.
So technically... at least my "may not" is actually written there. You're sort of just inferring yours.
I'd say write in to GW and in 3 years we'll have an answer.
|
Gwar: "Of course 99.999% of players don't even realise this, and even I am not THAT much of an ass to call on it (unless the guy was a total dick or a Scientologist, but that's just me)"
   |
|
|
|
|
2009/08/07 09:21:54
Subject: Exploding your own vehicle by ramming can the troops fire from inside?
|
|
Long-Range Ultramarine Land Speeder Pilot
Probably somewhere I shouldn't be
|
The Dragon wrote:yeah sure except, *shrugs* it doesn't actually use the word 'must'... it simply says that ON a result of 5 it disembarks.
So technically... at least my "may not" is actually written there. You're sort of just inferring yours.
I'd say write in to GW and in 3 years we'll have an answer.
Sorry, but:
BGB 'Effects of Damage Results on Passengers' pg.67 wrote:The passengers must immediately disembark and then take a Pinning test.
|
40k: WHFB: (I want a WE Icon, dammit!)
DR:80S+G+M(GD)B++I++Pw40k96+D+A+++/areWD206R+++T(M)DM+
Please stop by and check out my current P&M Blog: Space Wolves Wolf Lord |
|
|
|
|
2009/08/07 09:43:23
Subject: Exploding your own vehicle by ramming can the troops fire from inside?
|
|
Bounding Assault Marine
|
whopsi--- my bad. When I skimmed it before I didn't think it dropped the M-bomb.
Then again.. .fore me is 4:40 AM right now- you can tell by my typing going down the drain.
Still, I'd send for clarification to GW. it's in that hazy field where logic would seem to prevail, but then you have to sit back and remember who and what you're dealing with.
No where does it say that must negates a may not. Sure, pragmatically I understand the difference-- you and I already hashed that one out-- but you never know. These are the same guys who think it's swell to change the rules 2-3 times on some people and never update their codex. lol
|
Gwar: "Of course 99.999% of players don't even realise this, and even I am not THAT much of an ass to call on it (unless the guy was a total dick or a Scientologist, but that's just me)"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
