Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Nurglitch wrote:

spartanghost wrote:I'm surprised Gwar! hasn't come in here to RAW it up yet.

I'm pretty sure he's posted at least twice in this thread...

Oh he changed his avatar again. My mistake.

Gwar! wrote:I do believe good sir that a Document published by Games Workshop Plc. which consists of several Frequently Asked Questions does indeed clarify this issue.

This is blasphemy for you Gwar! Since when do you believe that FAQs fix anything?

Kreedos wrote:

Gwar! wrote:I do believe good sir that a Document published by Games Workshop Plc. which consists of several Frequently Asked Questions does indeed clarify this issue.

This is blasphemy for you Gwar! Since when do you believe that FAQs fix anything?

I said it Clarified the issue, not fixed it

It didn't need fixing anyway, as the rules do not say you can use the opponents wargear. Thus, you cannot. It was only added because 90% of 40k players find following rules to be too hard.

They don't say you can't use your opponent's wargear, and if the unit meets the criteria for using the wargear (e.g. Necrons being Necrons being able to be teleported) then I'd assume that you can.

Yes, I am aware of the permissive rule set. This complies with it.