Important Rules Question

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**kirsanth**

Akaiyou quoting the TO's own email wrote:
#1 who is to say that one could not carry a second list to fit the situation?

I will only bother with situations where they actually exceeded their allowed point total.

Like Nathan said, GW rules are open to fudging.

They did not set out to make cohesive rules like other competitive games. As such, you'll just have to accept how I choose to do things.

Those add up to a rather . . . annoying precedence.

I stand by my initial responses.

**Frazzled**

I am closing this thread. Its seriously beyond YMDC now and into batrep arguing. Plus the other parties are not here to defend themselves so this is bad form. Moving on.

Remember folks: