Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

H.B.M.C. wrote:

generalgrog wrote:At least GW is doing something with FAQ's now.

Yeah, like putting a big 'These aren't really official so do what you want' disclaimer on them.

They're doing something with the FAQ's. Nothing good though.

Except that every gamer I know, considers GW FAQ's as gospel. Even though they may disagree with them.

GG

99% of every Rogue Trader/GT too. YMMV

Q. When Epidemius’ tally reaches 20+ casualties
the rules say that ‘All attacks from followers of
Nurgle ignore armor saves’. Was this intended
to affect both ranged and close combat attacks
by the followers of Nurgle, as the text seems
to indicate?
A. Yes, that is indeed the case. Both ranged and
close combat attacks.

I can't believe how nobody is commenting about this. Sure, it's not that bad in regular games, but once you go Apocalypse with an Nurgle army it gets really ugly.

Especially seeing as he can hit that mark rather quickly with Aura/Noxious Touch by himself, but add this to the "Tally" and I would think his followers could make this rather quickly.

I'm assuming with a Chaos Daemons list when it says "follower of Nurgle" it needs to have "of Nurgle" or "Nurgling" or "Mark of Nurgle" in it's title to counts?

I think it say "everyone with a mark of Nurgel" in German book.