Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Seriously though, the Blood Angles so boring. I never really liked Geometry and having to get a protractor and figure out if their Predator was firing at me via a right angle or an obtuse or acute was just stupid.

No, I don't want to figure out which point the rays come together forming an endpoint. I learned this stuff in my freshman year. Just let me play the damn game.

themocaw wrote:I personally find the Blood Angles a bit too obtuse for my tastes. There's an acute lack of variety in their combat tactics, leading to only one right way to play them. I guess all I'm trying to say, obliquely, is that they're not exactly the most well rounded army.

More angular punditry! I love it!

themocaw wrote:I personally find the Blood Angles a bit too obtuse for my tastes. There's an acute lack of variety in their combat tactics, leading to only one right way to play them. I guess all I'm trying to say, obliquely, is that they're not exactly the most well rounded army.

That's a really bad sine, but I don't want to go off on a tangent...

How can you find the blood angels boring, unless you are losing to them a lot? I don't get bored of orks, despite their repetitive tactics of 1st turn shoot, 2nd turn assault.