Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Captain Solon wrote:Your all right. Who's to say hitler and Stalin wouldn't have made a real alliance had the idea been a beneficial one?

Who's to say, in some alternate Earth that they might not have formed a pact to invade Poland? Or that the US might have even formed a temporary alliance with the USSR?

Meanwhile, these are rules to help you and your mates play multi-army games. We don't all have the luxury of having multiple armies, so we have make the two sides out of what armies we've got. The rules in the book are flexible, and produce some fun rules for any unlikely pairings. This is all they were meant to do, and claiming fluff reasons for why certain pairings couldn't happen is prioritising the fluff over playing a game, which is generally a bad idea.

So... has everyone forgotten the "reluctant allies" rule for elves and dwarves?

This meant: any dwarf within 6" of an elf has -1LD on psychology and break tests and elves vice versa.