Switch Theme:

What Does Dakka Think About the Dark Eldar?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Eternally-Stimulated Slaanesh Dreadnought





behind you!

Vaktathi wrote:
Fetterkey wrote:Are we looking at the same army here? Trueborn are one of the most efficient units I can think of.
They cost a *lot* for what they do. They can take a lot of guns and have 2A base, but that also sorta splits their role awkwardly. Are they weapons platforms or CC units? Even with 2A base they don't really do CC very well for what they cost, so it's basically wasted points. Compared to an IG Vet squad for instance, they are 5pts more per model (about 71% more) and while better in CC, are costing almost twice as much for 10 Trueborn with 4 Blasters as a unit of 10 Vets with 3 Meltaguns, but generally aren't going to deliver 2x the casualties to the enemy (unless it's a unit of Carnifex's or something). That 5+ save is a giant kick in the balls for the unit, a 4+ would have made all the difference in the world.

I'd have rated them 10pts each honestly, with Warriors at 7. Doesn't sound like much but added up over 30-60 models it makes a huge difference.

When you compare them to similar role or similar cost units like IG vets, SoB's, etc they just seem to lack something.


I agree that as a close combat unit these guys leave alot to be desired, but the expanded weapon options are well worth the extra 3 (right? 3 points?) per guy. as a heavy weapon platform in the *elites* section no less I think they really shine. I agree with you that kabalite warriors are junk at 9 points a piece. IG Vets are just awesome sauce. nobody compares to them. I think thats a problem with the IG codex rather than the DE codex. SoBs same thing. If trueborn were troops they would be awesome.

   
Made in us
Alluring Mounted Daemonette






overpowered...and since when do vehicles get invul saves?


The Daemonic Alliance Infinite Points
Nightbringer's Darkness 3000 Points
Titan's Knights of the Round: 4000 points

"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." JFK 
   
Made in us
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch






Shenra wrote:overpowered...and since when do vehicles get invul saves?

Space Wolves have a vehicle with one.
   
Made in us
Eternally-Stimulated Slaanesh Dreadnought





behind you!

Shenra wrote:overpowered...and since when do vehicles get invul saves?

they're armor 10. what do you want?

   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




Is it a point and click codex? No. If you're looking for units that spell out their roles for you stick to the imperial books. Is it a winning army? yes.
   
Made in us
Terminator with Assault Cannon





Vaktathi wrote:For 5 Trueborn with Blasters in a double Splintercannon Viper, you can get 10 IG vets in a Chimera with 3 meltaguns and an Autocannon or almost 5 CSM termi's with combi meltas. That doesn't seem quite right, the Trueborn unit just seems too expensive and critical for that role relative to their survivability.


The unit of 5 Trueborn seems way better to me. I dunno.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: