| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/09 15:46:30
Subject: Re:GW Review of 2010
|
 |
Wraith
|
Where does it say what material the wings are made of?
Most likely they are a sci-fi carbon fiber that weighs next to nothing.
They may even be functional. Part of the DeepStrike accuracy ability.
|
Bam, said the lady!
DR:70S+GM++B+I+Pw40k09/f++D++A(WTF)/hWD153R+++T(S)DM++++
Dakka, what is good in life?
To crush other websites,
See their user posts driven before you,
And hear the lamentation of the newbs.
-Frazzled-10/22/09 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/09 20:21:01
Subject: GW Review of 2010
|
 |
[MOD]
Anti-piracy Officer
Somewhere in south-central England.
|
IoM stuff is usually encrusted with symbology of various types.
The wings could be made functional -- radiators or something like that.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/09 22:18:16
Subject: GW Review of 2010
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
The Blood Angels are obsessed with aesthetics, the beauty of the human form, and master artisanship - in that context the wings (and sculpted nipples/six packs) make perfect sense.
|
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2010/12/09 22:18:56
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/09 22:37:10
Subject: GW Review of 2010
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
H.B.M.C. wrote:The Blood Angels are obsessed with aesthetics, the beauty of the human form, and master artisanship - in that context the wings (and sculpted nipples/six packs) make perfect sense.
Within the context of the Warhammer 40K universe, anything makes perfect sense... except deep striking Land Raiders. That's just silly
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/09 22:50:32
Subject: GW Review of 2010
|
 |
Member of a Lodge? I Can't Say
Australia
|
Flashman wrote:Within the context of the Warhammer 40K universe, anything makes perfect sense... except deep striking Land Raiders. That's just silly 
+1 one to this. Give this man a cigar
|
H.B.M.C. wrote: Goood! Goooood!
Your hate has made you powerful. Now take your Privateer Press tape measure and strike me down with all your hatred and your journey to the dark side will be complete!!!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/09 23:26:27
Subject: GW Review of 2010
|
 |
Member of a Lodge? I Can't Say
|
It's funny to me how many people complain about the deep striking land raider thing. I can't imagine anyone actually deepstriking one in a real game.
Ya, you can take teleport homers and what not, but that's just points that you have to add on top of the cost of the already expensive unit you stuffed in there. And if they kill your teleport homered drop pod or scouts, then the risks you are taking of mishapping your (most likely 400 points at minimum) unit are very large. What I'm saying is the reward of deploying your LR into enemy lines does not equal the risk.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/09 23:29:50
Subject: GW Review of 2010
|
 |
Jovial Plaguebearer of Nurgle
|
How about all of the FAQ rulings?
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/10 03:03:40
Subject: GW Review of 2010
|
 |
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw
|
Deepstriking landraiders oi actually had someone do it to me ... than he tried to assault ... mega-fail
I'm liking the faq's for the most part ... except how they hosed Nids
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/10 05:42:54
Subject: GW Review of 2010
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
Flashman wrote:Within the context of the Warhammer 40K universe, anything makes perfect sense... except deep striking Land Raiders. That's just silly 
Yeah. You're actually right. Hadn't thought of that. Automatically Appended Next Post: Dok wrote:It's funny to me how many people complain about the deep striking land raider thing. I can't imagine anyone actually deepstriking one in a real game.
We've been over this before - it doesn't matter how sound or how broken or how useless the rule is, if it is a stupid concept, it fails anyway. We don't care that 'no one' does it - it could be the worst strategy in the whole Codex for all we care - but Deep Striking Land Raiders is just SILLY.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/12/10 05:45:29
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/10 06:15:47
Subject: GW Review of 2010
|
 |
Phanobi
|
I don't know, I still think of it as a T-hawk transporter dropping off the Land Raider from low altitude. That's kind of a cool visual in my mind.
|
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings. Look on My works, Ye Mighty, and despair.
Chris Gohlinghorst wrote:Holy Space Marine on a Stick.
This conversation has even begun to boggle my internet-hardened mind.
A More Wretched Hive of Scum and Villainy |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/10 06:58:36
Subject: Re:GW Review of 2010
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
Yes. It does. As per the picture. But the "Deep Strike" in the BA rulebook doesn't really conjure that for most of us.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/12/10 06:58:55
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/10 15:19:39
Subject: GW Review of 2010
|
 |
Swift Swooping Hawk
Canberra, Australia
|
Happygrunt wrote:Alpharius wrote:I bought a box of the Sanguinary Guard for use in my Raven Guard army!
They are that good!
I would get them, but I dont know what I would use them for...
They make good bases for my Eldar to stand on. Thats about it.
NOW BACK ON TOPIC YOU LOT !!
|
Currently collecting and painting Eldar from W40k. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/10 16:20:31
Subject: GW Review of 2010
|
 |
Veteran Knight Baron in a Crusader
|
Flashman wrote:Spearhead
 A Fire Prism that doesn't fall over. Yay!
 Guard players no doubt thought some of the other artillery tanks (i.e. Collosus) were more deserving of new kits
 A not particularly inspiring rule set blatantly designed to shift big plastic kits
The utterly uninspiring Deathstrike and Manticore kits were in short... an abomination! More like fisher price 40k. Agreed, there were more worthy vehicle but the manticore itself is a popular inclusion in lots of imp guard forces, poorly executed by GW. I'd have like to have seen a more inclusive kit upgrading the Basilisk, which was a waste of time, to include griffons, the collosus and Hydra etc.
Nice thread
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/10 17:24:31
Subject: GW Review of 2010
|
 |
[MOD]
Anti-piracy Officer
Somewhere in south-central England.
|
Dok wrote:It's funny to me how many people complain about the deep striking land raider thing. I can't imagine anyone actually deepstriking one in a real game.
Ya, you can take teleport homers and what not, but that's just points that you have to add on top of the cost of the already expensive unit you stuffed in there. And if they kill your teleport homered drop pod or scouts, then the risks you are taking of mishapping your (most likely 400 points at minimum) unit are very large. What I'm saying is the reward of deploying your LR into enemy lines does not equal the risk.
Hell, I would do it, just to see the other guy's face if it worked.
I don't have a Dangles army though.
Nice reviews by Flashman in the first post!!
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|