Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/03 23:48:41
Subject: Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
Rogue Inquisitor with Xenos Bodyguards
|
Like I said, time for the local Michael's or whatever you have that supplies the acrylics in the larger paint bottles/tubes for cheaper, and you get even MORE paint for the money than GW has in those tiny nearly 4dollar pots. At Michaels, I can get twice the paint for half the price.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/01/03 23:49:02
"Your mumblings are awakening the sleeping Dragon, be wary when meddling the affairs of Dragons, for thou art tasty and go good with either ketchup or chocolate. "
Dragons fear nothing, if it acts up, we breath magic fire that turns them into marshmallow peeps. We leaguers only cry rivets!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/04 00:01:02
Subject: Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
The Hammer of Witches
|
I still have a whole bag of the really really old ones were you had to either use your teeth to open them or risk loosing the paint all over the floor. They must be 13 years old and they still work - those hexagonal black lidded ones they brought out after simply dry up after about a year.
as for new paint I do like the vallejo style. And of course GW is run by profit hungry capitalists and we the proletariat must struggle against them, but thats just how the world rolls
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/04 00:01:43
Subject: Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
Mysterious Techpriest
|
Sentinel wrote:What I've heard is that the foundation paint pots are made the way they are so that they can drip better from the top lip into the citadel spray gun. Sounds kinda goofy, I know.
that makes sense actually, because the old pots have that massive rim that the paint would get wasted on.
also does anybody have a link/image of a Vallejov to GW chart, and where can you get them in the UK? I've decided to take the plung(dun dun dun) and am slowly going to change over. Automatically Appended Next Post: weetyskemian44 wrote:I still have a whole bag of the really really old ones were you had to either use your teeth to open them or risk loosing the paint all over the floor. They must be 13 years old and they still work - those hexagonal black lidded ones they brought out after simply dry up after about a year.
i've got some of them, and some of the white lidded ones, and a GW droper bottle, you relise GW did some good colors they don't do any more back in the good old day™© but they're annoying to open, the orange splatter on my green wall is proof of that
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/01/04 00:05:23
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/04 00:16:03
Subject: Re:Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
1.) The old Citadel pot is a protected form, guess the CHinese don't have the rght to copy that.
2.) The pin on the old foundation pots was meant as a stopper, not to keep the lid open. Paint spills down the side if kept open like this. Guess they removed the stopper because of the irritation.
3.) mail Order was surprised by Bleached Bone being OOP, they will look into it.
4.) Matching Vallejo Model Colours are easy to find, as their name is close to the Citadel name, but you find a chart here: http://www.miniaturewargaming.com/index.php/mwg/comments/vallejo_citadel_paints_comparison_guide/
Also note that Coat d'arms, the old manufacturer of these paints, still sells them: http://www.maelstromgames.co.uk/index.php?act=cat&cre=hob-cda-fcl . Chart here http://www.paintingclinic.com/productreviews/cdaconversionchart.htm .
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/04 00:25:16
Subject: Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot
|
Soladrin wrote:Aduro wrote:I MUCH prefer the bolter shells myself. I used them all the ways you're not supposed to use them, dipping paint off that little lip thing inside the lid, and wiping the brush off on the wide rim.
Same, and you can make killa cans out of the empty ones xD
Bolter shells? What?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/04 00:26:31
Subject: Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
Mysterious Techpriest
|
You're almost like a warhammer product encyclopedia Kroothawk, you seem to have anwsers for everything.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/04 00:35:18
Subject: Re:Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
Napoleonics Obsesser
|
Thanks. Coat d' arms sells ink washes, right? I need some red, yellow and chestnut ink. They were good colors.
And that was meant as a stopper? It didn't do much good
|
If only ZUN!bar were here... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/04 07:40:05
Subject: Re:Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
Possessed Khorne Marine Covered in Spikes
|
Khorne Flakes wrote:They changed the formulas to dry faster and the foundation pots dry up fast if not stored properly GW is trying to make you spend more
Of course they did, its all a massive conspiracy
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/01/04 07:40:16
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/04 07:45:45
Subject: Re:Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
Scouting Shade
|
Lokirfellheart wrote:CommissarCandlestick wrote:There's no benefit for us but they probably save money somehow and charge us more.
Most likely- Or they are designed so they hold slightly less, and they charge us more, as they look slightly narrower at the top compared to the old ones.
Seems the be going around everywhere! This also has happened at my local supermarket for prepared items. slightly smaller containers same price!
|
Visit my trade/sale list! Buy my OK! lol
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/333280.page |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/04 08:02:04
Subject: Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Folsom, CA, just outside Sacramento
|
im so confused, i have no idea whats going on...i still get the "old" black lid pots and bleached bone is OOP? when did this happen, cuz i just bought a bottle today...i suddenly feel "out of the loop"
|
Please visit my Trade Thread I'm always looking for something and usually have something up for trade.
6th Ed WDL: SM:25-1-10 I think I am actually decent at 6th
DT:90-S---G+M++B++IPw40k09#++D++A+/hWD387R+++T(M)DM+
8 good trades on here, 3 on bartertown
5000 points (red scorpions) 100% painted
Imperial Navy Strike force: 3000 points, all made from styrene sheet and cardboard cracker boxes...oh yea. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/04 08:40:13
Subject: Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
Storm Trooper with Maglight
Milwaukee, WI
|
jordanis wrote:im so confused, i have no idea whats going on...i still get the "old" black lid pots and bleached bone is OOP? when did this happen, cuz i just bought a bottle today...i suddenly feel "out of the loop" Gentlemen, I think we've discovered a time portal. Quick check for me: do they still have Squats? I need some for my Tank brigade!
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/01/04 08:41:31
18th Gamtilla Secundus Dragoon Guards Regiment: “The Lord Governor’s Own” |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/04 08:40:38
Subject: Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
Servoarm Flailing Magos
|
Thus why I switched to vallejo ages ago... eyedropper bottles and palettes = saved money
|
http://www.teun135miniaturewargaming.blogspot.com/ https://www.instagram.com/teun135/
Foxphoenix135: Successful Trades: 21
With: romulus571, hisdudeness, Old Man Ultramarine, JHall, carldooley, Kav122, chriachris, gmpoto, Jhall, Nurglitch, steamdragon, DispatchDave, Gavin Thorne, Shenra, RustyKnight, rodt777, DeathReaper, LittleCizur, fett14622, syypher, Maxstreel |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/04 09:59:39
Subject: Re:Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Izeya82 wrote:Lokirfellheart wrote:CommissarCandlestick wrote:There's no benefit for us but they probably save money somehow and charge us more.
Most likely- Or they are designed so they hold slightly less, and they charge us more, as they look slightly narrower at the top compared to the old ones.
Seems the be going around everywhere! This also has happened at my local supermarket for prepared items. slightly smaller containers same price!
Except the content is listd as the same amount on both (12ml/0.4fl oz) it's just the packaging that's smaller, as I'm sure they'd get into quite a lot of trouble with trading authorities if their contents were less than what is listed on the pot.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/04 10:36:21
Subject: Re:Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
Paramount Plague Censer Bearer
|
Just FYI but the Vallejo colors have similar names but match up weird ie. the ''Ultra blue'' or whatever is the equivalent to GW Enchanted Blue and "Magical blue'' is Ultramarines Blue. Found this stuff out while I was mixing and matching Vallejo/ GW for painting my Ultramarines - it made for one hell of a test model.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/01/04 10:38:55
BAMF |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/04 12:55:24
Subject: Re:Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
Boosting Ultramarine Biker
|
The foundation pot holds a little more, plus the clear lid lets you know what color you got. I will miss the screw on lids from the old ones.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/04 16:57:24
Subject: Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
Hardened Veteran Guardsman
|
jordanis wrote:im so confused, i have no idea whats going on...i still get the "old" black lid pots and bleached bone is OOP? when did this happen, cuz i just bought a bottle today...i suddenly feel "out of the loop"
Indeed, what the hell are you guys yappin about?
No really, I have no idea, can we have some pictures?
Also, am I the only one that take paint from the top of the containers? I figured since that speck of paint on the cover will usually dry out quicker when the pot is open I might as well use it. It also adds the bonus of getting to keep the thing only half-open which lets me paint for longer without worrying about closing it before the whole thing dries off.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2011/01/04 16:59:59
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/04 17:26:16
Subject: Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
The Last Chancer Who Survived
|
I like the foundation pots, they click and stay open, as do the washes. But not the normal paints. They have no clicker thingy in the hinge, and they want to close themselves. I like to take my paint fro the top of the cap, and that's pretty much impossible now. It's really annoying, and annoying me enough to just use vallejo instead.
I liked the black flip top lids the best. I like how it had the little flat part at the top inside that you could dab or do some light mixing. If you dab anything on the rim of the new pots, you're gonna get a big cakey mess. However, I do like the clear lid idea on the new ones.. that's about the only thing I do like.
My guess is these new pots are in some way cheaper to produce/purchase so even if they keep the prices the same, they make more in the end.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/04 17:30:57
Subject: Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
Sure Space Wolves Land Raider Pilot
|
Why the hell would you guys want to leave the paints open? Open paint dries, no matter how open it is. You complain that the paint has been drying faster lately, well close the lids and it won't! :O
|
500
DA:90-SG-M--B--I+Pw49k10#----D+A--/fWD371R----T(S)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/04 17:36:32
Subject: Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Folsom, CA, just outside Sacramento
|
Doctor Optimal wrote:jordanis wrote:im so confused, i have no idea whats going on...i still get the "old" black lid pots and bleached bone is OOP? when did this happen, cuz i just bought a bottle today...i suddenly feel "out of the loop"
Gentlemen, I think we've discovered a time portal.
Quick check for me: do they still have Squats? I need some for my Tank brigade!
...no...i think its because no one buys the paints at my lgs...since there are only 4 people who ever buy anything in the wargames department, everything sits on the shelf for a LONG time...
|
Please visit my Trade Thread I'm always looking for something and usually have something up for trade.
6th Ed WDL: SM:25-1-10 I think I am actually decent at 6th
DT:90-S---G+M++B++IPw40k09#++D++A+/hWD387R+++T(M)DM+
8 good trades on here, 3 on bartertown
5000 points (red scorpions) 100% painted
Imperial Navy Strike force: 3000 points, all made from styrene sheet and cardboard cracker boxes...oh yea. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/04 18:14:00
Subject: Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
The Last Chancer Who Survived
|
Paint drying too fast isn't an issue for me, I just add a couple drops of water when it stats getting a little thicker, give it a good shake and it's good as new
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/04 18:24:54
Subject: Re:Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
Death-Dealing Dark Angels Devastator
|
I haven't used the new pots for my regular paints yet but I don't have any problem with the foundation pots. I don't shake my paints, I stir them and then I put some paint on an old container lid, add a few drops of water to thin it out, and go to town. I will like the transparent lid as I also like to put a dot of paint on my pots to delineate what color it is.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/04 18:49:05
Subject: Re:Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
Hardened Veteran Guardsman
|
Ok, for people like me who have no idea what this is all about
You're welcome
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/04 19:22:22
Subject: Re:Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
Lord of the Fleet
|
MikeMcSomething wrote:Just FYI but the Vallejo colors have similar names but match up weird ie. the ''Ultra blue'' or whatever is the equivalent to GW Enchanted Blue and "Magical blue'' is Ultramarines Blue. Found this stuff out while I was mixing and matching Vallejo/GW for painting my Ultramarines - it made for one hell of a test model.
They do have colour conversion charts on their website. http://www.acrylicosvallejo.com/gb/downloads.html
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/04 22:20:46
Subject: Re:Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
Long-Range Ultramarine Land Speeder Pilot
|
MikeMcSomething wrote:
Just FYI but the Vallejo colors have similar names but match up weird ie. the ''Ultra blue'' or whatever is the equivalent to GW Enchanted Blue and "Magical blue'' is Ultramarines Blue. Found this stuff out while I was mixing and matching Vallejo/GW for painting my Ultramarines - it made for one hell of a test model.
Hmm... my ultramarine blue vallejo seems pretty close to GW... Maybe just a tad lighter?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/05 01:22:54
Subject: Re:Why did GW switch to the foundation pot?
|
 |
Grey Knight Psionic Stormraven Pilot
|
Kolath wrote:MikeMcSomething wrote:
Just FYI but the Vallejo colors have similar names but match up weird ie. the ''Ultra blue'' or whatever is the equivalent to GW Enchanted Blue and "Magical blue'' is Ultramarines Blue. Found this stuff out while I was mixing and matching Vallejo/GW for painting my Ultramarines - it made for one hell of a test model.
Hmm... my ultramarine blue vallejo seems pretty close to GW... Maybe just a tad lighter?
eveery GW paint has a vallejo paint equivalent theres a conversion chart in the article section which what i used
|
|
|
 |
 |
|