Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Jabbdo wrote:I think he meant to write "beast". If not...

Paging Dr. Freud?

Dr. Freud, your mother is on line one.

Edited the list:


Wolf Lord, TWM, SS, WC, Runic armor, Wolf Tail Talisman, Saga of Majesty 235

Wolf Lord, TWM, SS, PF, Runic armor, Wolf Tail Talisman, Saga of the Beastslayer 235

Wolf Lord, TWM, SS, TH, Runic armor, Wolf Tail Talisman, Saga of the Bear 265

5 Grey Hunters, flamer 75

5 Grey Hunters, flamer 75

5 Grey Hunters, flamer 75

5 Thunderwolf Cavalry, 1 w/ SS+PF, 1 w/ SS+bolter, 1 w/ SS+bolt pistol, 1 w/ meltabombs, 1 naked 370

6 Long Fangs, 5x ML 140

6 Long Fangs, 5x ML 140

6 Long Fangs, 5x ML 140

= 1750

Lost a lord, gained another scoring unit, another 2 ablative wounds for the deathstar, and another long fang squad. Oh, and all the lords have WTT so I get 3 chances to nullify on a 5+, I'm sure some people disagree on how its meant to be played (IG players with their gay little PBS always bitch about it) but until GW FAQ's it, IMO it does stack.

Jabbdo wrote: Oh, and all the lords have WTT so I get 3 chances to nullify on a 5+, I'm sure some people disagree on how its meant to be played (IG players with their gay little PBS always bitch about it) but until GW FAQ's it, IMO it does stack.

So you know GW will FAQ it? that means you are aware that you are playing like TFG but you dont care. then you call a unit "gay" and complain about IG players bitching.
I bet you're a real hit at your FLGS.

stompydakka wrote:

Jabbdo wrote: Oh, and all the lords have WTT so I get 3 chances to nullify on a 5+, I'm sure some people disagree on how its meant to be played (IG players with their gay little PBS always bitch about it) but until GW FAQ's it, IMO it does stack.

So you know GW will FAQ it? that means you are aware that you are playing like TFG but you dont care. then you call a unit "gay" and complain about IG players bitching.
I bet you're a real hit at your FLGS.

OK. So how does this add anything to this thread? Oh wait. It doesnt.

Actually, I'm playing it as stacking because when I read how its worded its how I interpret it. If somebody shows me a convincing explanation as to why it doesnt then I wont use it anymore, simple.

My remark on the PBS was intended to be humorous, my apologies if you had trouble understanding this.

So, the guy who assaults my thread and is obviously attempting to start a flame war is calling ME a douche. Nice.

At etc it was played as stacking. There will not be a GW FAQ going against this anytime soon, if ever.

I do not want to start a flame war. I did not like the fact that you generalize all IG players and refer to units as gay.

I do not find that remark humorous.

I sure hope GW doesnt FAQ it

@ stompydakka

My apologies then. As a side remark, I play IG myself, and regularly field a PBS.

ok. glad that's cleared up

Is it gay and little?

The PBS that is.

Jabbdo wrote:

Doomthumbs wrote:

italiaplaya wrote:
The list is a breast if done correctly.

It... sucks? I don't know what to make of that quote.

I think he meant to write "beast". If not...

Haha, fixed now