Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

What I do not understand from that screen shot(as it appears to be from the opponent of the daemon prince's objective list) is why you would want to destroy the second skull tower, rendering Kyras [i]in[i/]vulnerable.

That is right, lets make the guy we are fighting immune to damage :/

I might be able to buy that something else is going on(I have not played this game yet) but the syntax is all wrong, as "rendering" someone something is usually to take away some ability making them the opposite(as in normally you would "render X vulnerable")

Kommissar Kel wrote:What I do not understand from that screen shot(as it appears to be from the opponent of the daemon prince's objective list) is why you would want to destroy the second skull tower, rendering Kyras [i]in[i/]vulnerable.

That is right, lets make the guy we are fighting immune to damage :/

I might be able to buy that something else is going on(I have not played this game yet) but the syntax is all wrong, as "rendering" someone something is usually to take away some ability making them the opposite(as in normally you would "render X vulnerable")

Bad grammer, but it can still work. In this case the sentence is meant to say, "Destroy the second of the skull towers that are making Kyras invincible." Like I said, it's grammatically poor (and the definition sentence that I wrote is awkward at best). But it can be "worked" with.

Of course, it's also possible that Relic just didn't pay attention to which word they were using.

Please stop misspelling canon...

The grammar in that sentence is weird, definitely.

Destroy the second Skull Tower [that is] rendering Kyras invulnerable.

Melissia wrote:Please stop misspelling canon...

Fixed, but I'll just put it out there, that while I may not be as bad as many internet retards, my spelling is still beyond terrible. Grammar I can do though.