Theduke07 wrote:Is it really sporting to take older rules when there are new rules replacing them?
That depends. Older rules aren't necessarily better. As a matter of fact, I think the
apoc rules for the Trygon is worse than the newer tyranid rules.
Sometimes, there are different rules for the same unit. For example, the imperial guard valkyrie. I think the newer
IG has the better valkyries. However, in the
apoc book, the valkyrie, while not as efficient for the costs, is a flyer (which regular
40K doesn't have). Thus, you can say they're 2 completely different rulesets for the same unit. The thing is, you should declare which one you are using beforehand and pay for its respective points.
What I think would be unsporting is if you take the same unit from the previous version of the book for some benefits. For example, the Chaos Spawn is in both the newer
Apoc book as well as the older
IA apoc books. There's not much difference between the 2 except that the Chaos Spawn is much, much cheaper in the older
IA apoc books. That would be like me taking the flyrants from the older 4th edition tyranid codex because they were much cheaper and can have a 2+ save over the same flyrant from the newer codex. But taking a more expensive, gargantuan trygon with worse stats over the cheaper, non-gargantuan trygon
IMO isn't unsporting. My only caveat is that it's declared ahead of time, and you're consistent and use the same rules for all the trygons.