Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I think Draigo's fluff is horrible because it was horribly written. I actually like the whole tragic hero thing, how whatever he accomplishes no matter how awesome is instantly undone as if it had never happened. However the scope of Ward's ideas apparently exceed his writing abilities thus (IMHO) the fluff came out OTT and kinda wrecked my ability to suspend disbelief.

In conclusion, GW should just get Kanluwen to write Matt Ward's fluff, he is able to explain it much better than Ward himself can.

rabidaskal wrote:In conclusion, GW should just get Kanluwen to write Matt Ward's fluff, he is able to explain it much better than Ward himself can.

He could write down entire codex without a problem. I am sure it will be better than anything Ward write.

Am i mistaken that GK used to be those uber Deus Ex Machina SM that just appeared in small numbers, some up and left again? Don't get me wrong, i also think that the Codex is overdoing it..but on the other hand, this sounds pretty GK-Uber to me

I just hope they never release a Custodes Codex xD (well..i do, but im afraid that it'll crush my liking of them as the new Tyranid codex did for me :(( )