Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

nosferatu1001 wrote:god.ra - again, RAW states the opposite to your point. If you are touching terrain and LOS is blocked, then you get cover - whether you are a vehicle or not.

Nosferatu1001- again, since when the vehicles get cover for being or touching the area terrain ? form my understanding of rules, they get a Obscured save (4+) for blocked LOS when ya shoot at them Yes?
in order to get a save (obscured) you must draw a LOS YES? , the impaler ignores LOS YES? so you cannot draw LOS YES? therefore you cannot gain the Obscured save YES?

but well, lets wait for FAQ as this dicussion will be same as with KFF , which btw Nosferatu some peoples where right in their understadning of rules .....

The FAQ is RAW for all rules worded exactly this way. Rules can not work differently if they are worded the same way. An imaginary split between the two codices does not exists. All codices and the BRB are the WH40k rules, and all rules apply to everything in the same way.

god.ra - it states it does not need LOS to fire. It does not state that you ignore cover generated by LOS being blocked.

Actually it does, nos.

"The target will only receive cover saves that are not based on line of sight."

Jidmah wrote:Actually it does, nos.

"The target will only receive cover saves that are not based on line of sight."

Correct. No cover for vehicles, as they only get cover from LOS <50%.