Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

DeathReaper wrote:

Magpie wrote:Why do you say the vehicles aren't included, Psychic Pilot seems to say they are psykers.

Because GK Vehicles have the rule 'Psychic Pilot' which clearly states that they are "Treated as a psyker (Mastery lvl 1) and LD 10 for the purposes of Psychic tests and psychic hoods"

A Culexus assassin is neither a Psychic tests or a psychic hood. So they are not treated as a psyker as far as the Culexus assassin is concerned.

Fair enough,the do have Psychic Powers tho'. How does that impact on "Psyker's" who have a similar "for the purposes of" thing

Posting an image file as your post is considered spam on Dakka Dakka. -Mannahnin

I've always played it as psychic pilot counted as a psyker including perils counting as glances for mindstrike. So far no one seems to have minded that at all and it makes sense anyway.

Magpie - so what if the vehicle has a psychic power? It is ONLY a psyker for 2 conditions - neither of which a Culexus fulfils. It is very clear

Same for Psykers - they are ONLY a single psyker, ever.

Oh, and "i dont think its clear" when you reference zero rules to explain why it doesnt seem clear is singularly unhelpful in a rules discussion forum. The actual rules ARE clear - the name doesnt define the thing; Psykers are NOT a collection of individual psykers in the rules, they are only EVER one psyker. Thats it. No more clarity required, same as in the last thread about Psykers where you were wrong.

Finally - stop with Ghaz. You wrote something factually incorrect, and then tried to back peddle on it.