Switch Theme:

Characters unable to attack due to dead models?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Incorporating Wet-Blending






Glendale, AZ

elrabin wrote:
My copy doesn't have the third bullet point, so maybe they corrected it in the AOBR version.
Ditto. No third bullet point for me either.

Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.


 
   
Made in us
Captain of the Forlorn Hope





Chicago, IL

Ahh so the Big Rulebook and the Mini Rulebook are not the same!

"Did you notice a sign out in front of my chapel that said "Land Raider Storage"?" -High Chaplain Astorath the Grim Redeemer of the Lost.

I sold my soul to the devil and now the bastard is demanding a refund!

We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made.
 
   
Made in us
The Hive Mind





DeathReaper wrote:Ahh so the Big Rulebook and the Mini Rulebook are not the same!
SACRE BLEU!

My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals.
 
   
Made in im
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw





Liverpool

elrabin wrote:
DeathReaper wrote:The BRB also clears it up. Page 41 Left Column,attacking section third bullet point.

In fact I am not even sure why that Errata is there. P.41, third bullet point says the exact same thing as the Errata. (At least in the AOBR mini rulebook it is that way).

My copy doesn't have the third bullet point, so maybe they corrected it in the AOBR version.


Same here, only 2 bullet points. They must have updated later editions.
   
Made in us
Blood Angel Terminator with Lightning Claws




Montgomery, AL

Forcast wrote:So your saying is if there is a squad of 5 paladins with draigo attached, and i charge them and declare my attacks are going on the unit not draigo, my opponent cant allocate the instant death wounds to draigo to take advantage of his EW? If this is true, some GK players at my local store are going to be sad.


Just remember if a model is only in base contact with Draigo then they must attack Draigo.

On Dakka he was Eldanar. In our area, he was Lee. R.I.P., Lee Guthrie.  
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




The BRB was printed firsst and, as the 3rd bullet point is *errata* later printings - which include the AOBR version - have been updated to incorporate errata. Cf to the Ork codex, with the updated Warbiker stats (which ironically introduced another error - that non-nobs have 2W each) and removal of Waaaagh! rules from units that could never make use of them, such as stormboyz
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: