Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Frag/Plasma Grenades should be 3d6 scatter, half the models can throw, small blast, S3 AP-

Krak same rules, S7 AP1 no blast,

Melta the same as close combat but throwable
defensive slow enemies to charge range d6"

Lightning Shadows wrote:Frag/Plasma Grenades should be 3d6 scatter, half the models can throw, small blast, S3 AP-

Krak same rules, S7 AP1 no blast,

Melta the same as close combat but throwable
defensive slow enemies to charge range d6"

I hope you're not serious... there are so many things wrong with this.

1)18" possible scatter? No infantry model has any business throwing anything that far. The amount of damage you'd do to yourself would be lulzy though.

2) 15 small blasts from a 30 man blob? Holy throne...

3) S7 AP1? Really? S6 AP4 would be pushing it.

4) AFAIK the fluff and rules both call for meltabombs to be attached to the target. Throwing them doesn't make sense.

Now defensive grenades causing difficult terrain would be interesting, but negating the +1 attack is already awesome. They'd need a price hike.

DoW