Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Happyjew wrote:

rigeld2 wrote:And the Deathmark ruling goes against that FAQ. Sigh. Where's the consistency?

Wait, the Deathmark ruling goes against which FAQ now?

Sorry, poor wording on my part.

The Deathmark FAQ implies there's two units in one -because Deathmarks mark a unit, not a model.
The FAQ implies two units as there's two KP.
Tyranid Primes are said (in YMDC) to not be allowed to Outflank using Hive Commander (by attaching to a troop unit). Implies two units - if it was just the one Troop unit, they could outflank.
The semi-recent SoB argument about a faith power - was said to be one unit, IC loses unitness.
This thread - one unit, IC loses unitness.

But then how can an ability that targets a unit target an IC that is attached to a unit without explicit permission if there is only one unit to target?
Do you see the inconsistencies I'm talking about?