Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Armour facing doesn't have anything to do with the size of a model.

90 degree arcs dont suddenly become 35 degrees because of a different model.

DeffDred wrote:Armour facing doesn't have anything to do with the size of a model.

90 degree arcs dont suddenly become 35 degrees because of a different model.

Size? no. Shape, yes. A "more square" shape model will have a wider front arc (even on all sides, really) than a much "skinnier" one will.

DeffDred wrote:Armour facing doesn't have anything to do with the size of a model.

90 degree arcs dont suddenly become 35 degrees because of a different model.

Except you don't draw 90 degree arcs. You draw from the middle to the corners.

DeffDred wrote:Armour facing doesn't have anything to do with the size of a model.

90 degree arcs dont suddenly become 35 degrees because of a different model.

Actually 90 degree arcs can become 35 degrees because of a different model, if the model has a narrower shape, since you measure the arc from the corners of the model.

I personally would be pretty annoyed if someone wanted to do this (and I've played a guy using Lord of the Rings models as "proxies" for sisters of battle) but i can't say I'd have too big of an issue being able to pop his predator first turn due to LoS