Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

orks... they rode a 4th edition codex through 6th edition and stayed competitive the whole way

greyknights are just the johnny come late-lies of the game

Necrons get my vote. They got a ton of new units and became VERY competitive while still being balanced.

OP, FYI its ORKS with a K, not ORCS with a C. They are from different games man

Tau win, because they're my army.

MY LOGIC IS INFALLIBLE.

BT for hanging in there being underestimated the whole edition and still having tricks up their sleevs to win games the way the codex isint even designed to do.

Orks (which you misspelled), stayed strong the whole way through. They players bought models and they were a strong line all season long. I'd give them best record and GK playoff champs.

I wanted to vote my army, guard, but couldn't. I had to do Dark Eldar. 24 inch charge range wyches and spamming dark lances everywhere makes them terribly effective against pretty much every army I've fielded.

Additionally, I hate the new guard codex for taking out the ability to personalize your army. Why would you take out doctrines? Seriously? Taking away the specialization and ability to personify yourself through your army is so counter to what should happen it's heart breaking. I wish I could go back and use it instead of this stupid one.

GK are broken and all who face them have to deal with a natural handicap. They "won" in a competitive sense, even though they're unfun an d their fluff was terrible.

Dark Eldar probably won in terms of benefit though. They were GW at their best. The fluff was entertaining and expanded the DE without making them Mary Stu's (GK), changing who they were (Necrons), or boring (MEQ's). They also made them a unique-feeling army that's also competitive but not broken. Lastly, there's a wide variation of models and units to choose from and most of them look quite cool.

Ignatius wrote:I wanted to vote my army, guard, but couldn't. I had to do Dark Eldar. 24 inch charge range wyches and spamming dark lances everywhere makes them terribly effective against pretty much every army I've fielded.

Additionally, I hate the new guard codex for taking out the ability to personalize your army. Why would you take out doctrines? Seriously? Taking away the specialization and ability to personify yourself through your army is so counter to what should happen it's heart breaking. I wish I could go back and use it instead of this stupid one.

I have a List you'd hate at 1,500 which makes your Dark Lances ineffective. Blessed hull Land Raiders.


Assuming of course that either of our armies isn't nerfed by 6th

I thought the preview and advance orders was going up today?

Did they cancel 6th?

Saturday... Greenwich time 0:00 or the like.

Every vote other than GK or IA is a troll.

/e: DE are fine too.

/e: Really? 2 Tyranid votes? COME ON.

People love an underdog.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
And I agree with all the anti GK folk in here. They are like the Harlem Glob trotters compared to every other basketball team. Just pure ridiculousness

League champions: Dark Eldar
Most over the top: Grey Knights.

Honourable mention: Tyranids for remaining to be playable under the influence of cruddace...

Sigvatr wrote:Every vote other than GK or IA is a troll.

Risking to sound more rude than I intend: Please, shut up. Not agreeing with you does not make anyone a troll.