Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

ObliviousBlueCaboose wrote:

Grey Templar wrote:There is no Wolf Priest model. Only Ulrik the Slayer.

You must be using the Rune Priest model as a Wolf Priest, which make that model illegal to use as a Wolf Priest. Unless you clarify with your opponent that its actually a Wolf Priest and he has a Power Maul not an Axe.

I believe there is no rule that states you have to use the OFFICIAL GW MODEL! NO CONVERSIONS! NO KIT BASHES! IF WE DON'T HAVE IT SUCKS TO BE YOU! This game is also a hobby so if the person wants to make a Wolf Priest he can, and since there is no model to base it on, he can choose which Power weapon to use.

no, but you do have to model the dude with the proper wargear.

If you scrath build is now illegal, well, sucks to be you.

Grey Templar wrote:

ObliviousBlueCaboose wrote:

Grey Templar wrote:There is no Wolf Priest model. Only Ulrik the Slayer.

You must be using the Rune Priest model as a Wolf Priest, which make that model illegal to use as a Wolf Priest. Unless you clarify with your opponent that its actually a Wolf Priest and he has a Power Maul not an Axe.

I believe there is no rule that states you have to use the OFFICIAL GW MODEL! NO CONVERSIONS! NO KIT BASHES! IF WE DON'T HAVE IT SUCKS TO BE YOU! This game is also a hobby so if the person wants to make a Wolf Priest he can, and since there is no model to base it on, he can choose which Power weapon to use.

no, but you do have to model the dude with the proper wargear.

If you scrath build is now illegal, well, sucks to be you.

Yeah I added "Until they FAQ it" to my text. As of now if its not in the FAQ as a Power Maul, or uses the same as rules as the C:SM they have to follow the "look at the model and see what it has" clause. No model means they cant see what type of power weapon it has, So that either means you chose which one to use or just ignore the weapon (no power weapon for you WP)

Paris.in.Flames wrote:

Oppressor wrote:

Testify wrote:

Phragonist wrote:

narked wrote:Pistols do have the "Melee" tag, when used in melee. They use the standard close combat weapon profile. So Marines don't get a bonus attack

regular marines dont have a close combat weapon AND a pistol? for two close combat weapons?

No, they have boltguns and CCW. No bolt pistols.

Um, vanilla marines have a boltgun, a bolt pistol and no CCW.

I dont have the rulebook in front of me a the moment, but i am almost positive that it says you only the +1 attack if have BOTH a close combat weapon and pistol.

My bad, my brain is still absorbing all the new rules.

So axes are better than swords? The gak?
At least they can parry, and strike at ap3..... Yeah there goes my termie killers.
Apart from my melta fest and my lascannons.
And my melta pistols.
And my plasma pistols.
And my Sternguard that are equiped with combi-meltas....
You know something to even the odds.
Chessy? Not really. I don't take tanks.
Also Libys look awesome now to take. They use to suck. But now chapter masters are awesome

There's no parry. That was a rumor.