Those Special Rules That You Hate Or Dislike . . . . .

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**nosferatu1001**

Tod wrote:An ork waaagh is almost pointless now as you can't run and assault

Rerolling your charge distance is useless?

**Locclo**

IXLoiero95XI wrote:so true for Furious Charge the no +1 I means it is just pointless

Really depends on what's got it, to be honest. For the most part, Orks don't give a damn about it - at base I2, practically everything is going ahead of them even if they were I3 on the charge. (Eldar, Dark Eldar, every Marine without a hammer or fist) Against the few things that it would benefit them, like Imperial Guard, the opponent isn't exactly going to shred the entire mob down in one round of assault before I2 comes along.

**Evil_Toast**

The Inertial Guidance System for Drop Pods grates my carrot . Why does a 50pt AV12 model get this , when say , a Monolith , AV14 , doesn't (anymore) ?

**acekevin8412**

Paitryn wrote:My Orks losing the +1 I for FC. Before I had the chance of getting simultaneous attacks, now I go last almost every time.

Necron's are set to be a rising force, you'll be hitting simultaneously with them.

**MarkyMark**

Is eternal warrior on that many IC's? it seems to be a bit nonsensical on what ic's it is on from what I have seen

**Testify**

There is too much EW. I play demons and I don't understand why it's army-wide. Sure the MCs should have it (all MCs I mean), but is there any reason a herald of tzeentch should be twice as durable against lascannons?

**acekevin8412**

MarkyMark wrote:Is eternal warrior on that many IC's? it seems to be a bit nonsensical on what ic's it is on from what I have seen

I'm gonna do some research do see just how many units actually have EW.
Will report back.

**Roadkill Zombie**

I hate:

Random run distances...what's that all about? There's no reason for it. If you were running in the open it should just be a straight up 6 inches to run. It would make more sense to have the random run distance happen if you were trying to run through difficult terrain rather than just everywhere.

We'll Be Back....That rule has lost me more games than I care to count. It's like I'm taking on 1/3 or more points every single time I have to face a Necron player. Add in the fact that the guys who always seem to pass it are also the guys that have an AP 1 weapon and/or Mindshackle Scarabs. It's just stupid that I have to keep going back to kill the same guy over...and over...and over...and over...and over..and over...and...oops...game has ended and now that guy is contesting the objective...too bad you lose dude!

any rule that doesn't allow an Invulnerable save...I think it's wrong to take something away that supposedly you always get. I just don't like it. Invulnerable should mean just what it says...invulnerable!