Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 Wyrmalla wrote:
0.o People use that D3+2 for each table quarter thing? It always came across to me as not enough. Then again I like to just put everything on the box on the table and make a nice, cramped looking city.

I do the same lol.
I usually pre-setup a ruined looking city before friends come by for a game, make it as fairly placed as possible for anyone deploying on any table edge.

But i believe in each mission It tells you to follow terrain deployment which is the D3+2, but more then likely gets overlooked or ignored. Fortifications will become a standard i feel, for alot of lists tournament wise and maybe(hopefully) not so much local meta.

I threw together an aegis defense line out of foam this weekend just to see how hard it would be. If it tends too cheesy I will stop using it.

I've came up against opponents who've enforced the D3+2 terrain rule. To say the least, they weren't fun games. =P

 Wyrmalla wrote:
I've came up against opponents who've enforced the D3+2 terrain rule. To say the least, they weren't fun games. =P

Agreed!

Setting up your own table is sooo much better