Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 CptJake wrote:
On the other hand, you are speculating as to why the judge may be doing so.

Escept that isn't at all what I did. All I did was list some reasons why bail might be held and/or why bail would be given one time but then not allow a release. I never state that those things happened or said that they did happen, as that would be speculating. Explaining a process doesn't require endorsement of a process or limit a process to only things listed. I have no idea what is happening there so I won't speculate on it, but I can extol some conditions under which those actions may be warranted under law.

A: They only reached four by adding two plus two!
B: Three plus One is an option, or two point five plus one point five are also possible ways to reach four.
You: Why are you speculating?

Recognizing options isn't an endorsement of them, nor is it speculation to know what options are available. Making a guess based on that information, when limited, is speculation.

EDIT: On second thought I'm staying out of this one.

Sucks to be stuck in the state of Misery... I mean, Missouri.

 Vulcan wrote:
EDIT: On second thought I'm staying out of this one.

Sucks to be stuck in the state of Misery... I mean, Missouri.

It's only Misery if we're talking about our summer here...

Other than that, it's peachy here.