Switch Theme:

Is this stretching the "Counts-as" philosophy?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Leader of the Sept







 Exergy wrote:
 livanbard wrote:
Why eldar if you are building admech forces?


because admech doesnt have a codex and thus you have to use someting.

necrons, CSM, IG, tau all have options but eldar are about as good as any


You get some rather nice Admech counts-as tyranids as well

http://www.dakkadakka.com/core/gallery-search.jsp?dq=oddjob

Given that the Adeptus Mechnicus deals in technology that no-one really understands and is one step down from magic, you can easily explain away the abilities of any race as being some part of a dark age of technology kit. Just remember to make some magic hand-waves and call it mysteeeeeerious technology

Please excuse any spelling errors. I use a tablet frequently and software keyboards are a pain!

Terranwing - w3;d1;l1
51st Dunedinw2;d0;l0
Cadre Coronal Afterglow w1;d0;l0 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: