Broadside Bash at Kingdom-Con, April 26th-27th, San Diego CA

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**schadenfreude**

captkurt wrote:
mortetvie wrote:

Ok, but how does it work if an army does not take GK as an ally but instead takes an inquisitorial detachment and Coteaz?

Is it that everyone is entitled to an inquisitorial detachment as per the inquisitor book (which does not count as an ally itself but just an extension of the normal force org slot) and then if they take Coteaz that uses the ally slot?

Or is it that anyone taking units from the inquisitor book counts as an ally and Coteaz being an entry in the inquisitorial book is not an extra allied slot?

Or is it that you can take inquisitor units or Coteaz but not both?

Just want some clarification with the inquisitorial detachment rules for your event, thanks =).

Per the BSB rules, you can take 1 allied force MAX. You are NOT allowed to also take Inquisitors. They count as an allied force. Basically we are allowing a max of 2 sources in your army.

Coteaz can go with the GKs, because he is part of that Codex.

Or you could take an Inquisition force as your allied detachment.

Cool so I can take an inquisition force as my allies including Coteaz with IG primary, but the inquisition counts as my 1 and only allied detachment.

**captkurt**

Grimgob wrote:
I have a question. Would say someone using a supplement be able to use a detachment? As for example, could I play Space Marines; Sentinels of Terra with a IG attachment? I'm using 3 books but 2 armies, how does that work?

Is Sentinels of Terra usable without Codex: Space Marines? Isnt it just an expansion specific to the Imperial Fists?

Automatically Appended Next Post:

schadenfreude wrote:

Cool so I can take an inquisition force as my allies including Coteaz with IG primary, but the inquisition counts as my 1 and only allied detachment.

Correct.

**mortetvie**

Are you guys going to allow iyanden supplement to ally with the main eldar book?

**schadenfreude**

List submitted. I really want to play AM in the broad side bash. I hope it's kosher, but if not I included a backup IG list.

**Phazael**

I would be shocked if they had a problem with it. Debate the value of AM all you want, but the rules are air tight in that book.

**dkellyj**

Problem with AM is the Dex is only a week old. It would be pretty difficult to get the models, put them together, paint them, and submit a list (which should have been submitted 2 weeks before the Codex came out).
I'm also playing Guard. Last hurrah for Ordnance Tanks.

**mortetvie**

Well, considering how the BSB 40k rules section specifically says that they will "NOT be using the 2014 IG codex" I can't inagine they would allow the new AM book to be used. That is unless they make an exception to what they have stated on this web page wich would be a bummer for anyone else who wanted to use the new book but didn't.

Anyway, you still have a solid army Andrew, especially if you keep rolling the ignores cove power like you always seem to do against me

.

**captkurt**

Nope, the new IG book or Adeptus Militatium (or whatever) is not allowed at this time.

**schadenfreude**

It's all good I was going to field pretty much the same list with AM or IG.

What I really want to know is how my Immobile units will work when they are forced into reserves by scenario 6

**mortetvie**

They destroy the space time continuum and the universe explodes...

I'd imagine they just come in like normal reserves and are placed as far as they need to be to get onto the board but otherwise don't move, I know you have some oddly shaped artillery units but that seems to make the most sense!

**captkurt**

schadenfreude wrote:
It's all good I was going to field pretty much the same list with AM or IG.

What I really want to know is how my Immobile units will work when they are forced into reserves by scenario 6

We decided that in that case, the actual models are placed on the table, but the crew will come in from reserves. In either case, they cannot fire the turn that they come in from reserves.

**Vaktathi**

I know FW used to just have them Deep strike onto the board (air-dropped or emerging from positions, etc). if the guns are placed on the table but the crew come in from reserves, can the guns still be shot at?

**schadenfreude**

Vaktathi wrote:
I know FW used to just have them Deep strike onto the board (air-dropped or emerging from positions, etc). if the guns are placed on the table but the crew come in from reserves, can the guns still be shot at?

captkurt wrote:
schadenfreude wrote:
It's all good I was going to field pretty much the same list with AM or IG.

What I really want to know is how my Immobile units will work when they are forced into reserves by scenario 6

We decided that in that case, the actual models are placed on the table, but the crew will come in from reserves. In either case, they cannot fire the turn that they come in from reserves.

Seems nice and clean cut. If the guns are on then my guess is they can be shot. The only units left in question are the T6 no crew units like tarantulas and hyperios.

Automatically Appended Next Post:
As an IG player with a lot of artillery I like the scenario. It gives vehicles an edge over artillery when 6th ed heavily favors artillery.

**captkurt**

Broadside Bash 2014 after action report...

http://broadside-bash.blogspot.com/2014/04/broadside-bash-2014-after-action-report.html