Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

No big changes? Surprised nobody picked up that Coteaz lost the Lord of Formosa special rule, so no more Objective Scored Henchmen for C:I. Big nerf.

Oh WTF srsly?

Welp time to switch over to C:GK at least they arnt completely boned yet.

Edit: Actually thats just over blowing it. the book is still nice for getting 2 inquisitors without the need for troops. and the relics

Sister's was updated, too They changed the comdemnor boltgun rules.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Apparently that was the only flaw in our pristine codex.

 deviantduck wrote:
Sister's was updated, too They changed the comdemnor boltgun rules.

They did that months ago.

 deviantduck wrote:

 pretre wrote:
Didn't see anything obvious for SOB. Too bad they didn't make the Apoc formations normal formations.

Celestine with a rerollable 4+ isn't too powerful at all.. when she stands up again.

With that formation she also gets to come in from reserves on any turn you choose, no roll, right?

My real question is can inquisitors still choose Hammerhand, or do they have to roll for powers?

Generates powers only.

May upgrade to a Psyker (Mastery Level 1), generating powers from the Daemonology (Sanctic), Divination, Pyromancy, Telekinesis and Telepathy disciplines - 30 pts

 pretre wrote:

 deviantduck wrote:
Sister's was updated, too They changed the comdemnor boltgun rules.

They did that months ago.

They did again, that's what changed on the 13th of june. They added "One Use Only"

 deviantduck wrote:

 pretre wrote:

 deviantduck wrote:
Sister's was updated, too They changed the comdemnor boltgun rules.

They did that months ago.

They did again, that's what changed on the 13th of june. They added "One Use Only"

lol. Great.

Yea, loss of "Lord of Formosa" is huge.

That's devaluing my product after I purchased it. Can I get some sort of return from Apple because of this?

Really upset to see GW not take the opportunity to give the Ordos Hereticus Maelific Daemonology.

 NecronLord3 wrote:
Really upset to see GW not take the opportunity to give the Ordos Hereticus Maelific Daemonology.

I think you mean give radicals malefic. Since no ordo would officially use it.

 TheKbob wrote:
Yea, loss of "Lord of Formosa" is huge.

That's devaluing my product after I purchased it. Can I get some sort of return from Apple because of this?

That's not a devalue. The update is no different than a FAQ update. The rule was simply wrong originally. Actually, come to think about it now, you probably need to apologize for using that broken rule to begin with.

 pocketcanoe wrote:

Psyker has access to brb powers

...

Generally a minor update along the same lines as the grey knights FAQ.

Looks like the Inq Psykers lost the Psychic Barrage (which is still in there for them in the GK Codex).

 pretre wrote:

 NecronLord3 wrote:
Really upset to see GW not take the opportunity to give the Ordos Hereticus Maelific Daemonology.

I think you mean give radicals malefic. Since no ordo would officially use it.

Really? They're wielding daemon weapons harnessing the power of Daemonhosts and you are making that statement? Even if it isn't official it's still likely by either intent or accident.

Daemon weapons are only available to Malleus and heretical Malleus at that.

 jlong05 wrote:

 TheKbob wrote:
Yea, loss of "Lord of Formosa" is huge.

That's devaluing my product after I purchased it. Can I get some sort of return from Apple because of this?

That's not a devalue. The update is no different than a FAQ update. The rule was simply wrong originally. Actually, come to think about it now, you probably need to apologize for using that broken rule to begin with.

It is a devalue boss. They already FAQd a similar character to give his elites objective secured. So thus it cannot be a stand alone codex anymore because scoring in 7E means Objective Secured.

They fundamentally changed how a character is played.

Then again, I can see my sarcasm meter is broken...

 pretre wrote:
Daemon weapons are only available to Malleus and heretical Malleus at that.

Malleus is what I meant from the beginning sorry got them confused. Malleus should have mallefic daemonology, missed opportunity IMO.

They should email you with an alert when they change one of their web-books - surely can't be difficult.