Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/23 02:50:11
Subject: All Wraith Eldar lists still good/possible with new codex?
|
 |
Shas'la with Pulse Carbine
Los Angeles, CA
|
Another question, if I use the Wraithhost formation, does the Wraithknight still give the other person the perks from me using a LoW?
|
6400 Pts
4300 Pts
3200 Pts
2600 Pts
3080 Pts 30k
2460 Pts AoS Chaos Grand Alliance
2680 Pts AoS Sylvaneth |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/23 02:52:17
Subject: All Wraith Eldar lists still good/possible with new codex?
|
 |
Furious Fire Dragon
|
Noctem wrote:Well it's pointless for me to argue, and I don't have the codex in front of me. Just seeing it say 1-12 per guardian host makes me hesitant. I do hope you can take the Wraithhost on it's own though!
I have the codex. Automatically Appended Next Post: Noctem wrote:Another question, if I use the Wraithhost formation, does the Wraithknight still give the other person the perks from me using a LoW?
I think only if your local group (and the tournaments you attend) incorporate the Escalation rules.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/04/23 02:53:40
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/23 20:15:26
Subject: All Wraith Eldar lists still good/possible with new codex?
|
 |
Rampaging Khorne Dreadnought
|
The reason they put limitations on the formations is because they apply to the detachment of formations. All the formations are still formations in their own right. You don't have to take the detachment. I could use a Wraithhost formation for my Chaos marines if I wanted to, just like you could make an army consisting of as many wraithhost formations as you want with nothing else. Meeting the restrictions of the detachment simply gives you FURTHER bonus rules in addition to the wraithhost rules.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2015/04/23 20:15:56
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/23 20:40:02
Subject: All Wraith Eldar lists still good/possible with new codex?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Here:
WraithHost Formation alone: Wraiths reroll to hit when near the Spiritseer
GuardianHost + WraithHost Formation: Wraiths run 6" AND reroll to hit when near Spiritseer
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/23 20:58:51
Subject: All Wraith Eldar lists still good/possible with new codex?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
KiloFiX wrote:Here:
WraithHost Formation alone: Wraiths reroll to hit when near the Spiritseer
GuardianHost + WraithHost Formation: Wraiths run 6" AND reroll to hit when near Spiritseer
Correct.
|
"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."
This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.
Freelance Ontologist
When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/23 21:03:20
Subject: All Wraith Eldar lists still good/possible with new codex?
|
 |
Powerful Phoenix Lord
|
I thought that the wording was that the Wraith units re-roll to hit against *enemy units* near the Spiritseer. Meaning that Spiritseer has to be within range of that Imp Knight for the WK to re-roll against it
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/23 22:19:20
Subject: All Wraith Eldar lists still good/possible with new codex?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Well, something like that.
I was "Correct[ing]" that the Wraith Host is a formation independent of the Warhost. It can be used with a Combined Arms Detachment or even Unbound. There's no requirement that it only be used with a Warhost detachment.
|
"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."
This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.
Freelance Ontologist
When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/24 00:29:58
Subject: All Wraith Eldar lists still good/possible with new codex?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Chicago, Illinois
|
Who cares about the Warhost and Guardians.
Take it as a ally with Dark Eldar and put those Wraithguard in Fast Support Raiders.
|
If I lose it is because I had bad luck, if you win it is because you cheated. |
|
 |
 |
|