Switch Theme:

Is there any reasonable changes to make Wraithblades more viable?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





From what I gather in this thread it's not that they're bad, it's just that they're not as good as something else. Honestly, I think this is something GW should explore more in their game design, where they find models that have under sold and buff them a little, or leave them the same, while also reducing the power of the models that have sold the most until both are on about the same level of power for their relative niches. It would add a lot more horizontal power growth to the game, while also allowing them to tweak the strength in a sinusoidal manner, such that they don't have to create massive power creep.

I'll pluck you like a flower.

Tau Painting Blog [Updated: 12/27/15 Happy Dronecember!] : http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/662024.page#8088404

LVO List Data Base (Submit your list if you played! Growing All the Time!): https://www.dropbox.com/sh/y28px3mgjeergdn/AADDpUf3n_u2QfkiYzDzHSh0a?dl=0 
   
Made in ru
!!Goffik Rocker!!






Play possessed instead of wraithblades. You'll quickly find out your gak's amazing.
   
Made in us
Imperial Guard Landspeeder Pilot




On moon miranda.

Yeah, there's really nothing wrong with Wraithblades, there's just not much reason to take them when you can get D weapon equipped versions for the same investment.

IRON WITHIN, IRON WITHOUT.

New Heavy Gear Log! Also...Grey Knights!
The correct pronunciation is Imperial Guard and Stormtroopers, "Astra Militarum" and "Tempestus Scions" are something you'll find at Hogwarts.  
   
Made in nl
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch



Netherlands

Wraithblades are assault units. Assault units suffer bad. That's all there is to it honestly.

And because there was a comparison between Wraithblades and carnifexen (dunno why tbh).

Wraithblades are 30 pts per wound, same as the naked carnifex. Dunno if the wraithblades have to pay points to upgrade to an axe and shield, I would assume they don't.

So 4 wraithblades are equal cost as a naked carnifex. They are both 4 wounds, T6, 3+ save, 4 basic attacks, ap2.

Carnifex has HoW, str 9 and does not lose functionality as it takes wounds.

Wraithblades have double the attacks on the charge, 8 vs 5+ d3 from HoW so basically the Wraithblades come ahead even if a fex rolls 5-6 for the HoW (they're ap-), they get 4++ save, higher Ws, higher initiative (or are the axes unwieldy?).

So you get to choose between having high strength or having a 4++, higher Ws and Initiative mostly. Wraithblades are just fine the way they are. It's the shooting stuff that are playing in a whole different level that makes anything assaulty look bad.

14000
15000
4000 
   
Made in ca
Regular Dakkanaut




Drop their points, add 5 wounds, make the blade a D weapon.... Please man....
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: