Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Well, Rule of Cool, sure.

Just to reiterate again, this is not for rules discussion on who's better. If you must think in those sense, Imagine if the Wraithknight costs 400 points (or whatever you think would be "fair" for it) and then compare. Oh and don't turn this into an argument about the "right" cost I don't want a certain vocal individual showing up and derailing the thread.

Basically, which one you like in concept. I voted for baneblades because, again, massive house-sized tanks down the battlefield is just so much more primal than walkers.

That vocal individual already went on and on about how the GW points costs for BB-class vehicles were perfect, because he backwards-engineered the points from the GW-assigned costs. And supposedly playtested it extensively. Despite it being total nonsense and broken within minutes once Dakka started looking at it. But you can check out the VDR thread if you don't believe me.

OTOH, there's another vocal individual who'd be saying that the 52% majority of the responses are trolling because he disagrees, and only the 48% minority matters because they voted as he did...

Anyhow, it's very clear that Giant Robots are better than Big Tanks.

If I remember my saturday morning cartoons correctly, chicks dig giant robots.