Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 Sgt_Smudge wrote:

 Traditio wrote:

fresus wrote:
You used to be better at trolling.
People still take the bait but come on, it's too obvious.

Shall I take this posting as an assertion that you will, indeed, vote "Feth GW"? Or will you vote for the opposition poll option, "Yea verily, feth GW"?

Or, perhaps, neither?

That would just be silly.

No reasonable person would select the "neither" option.

Thus the reason I have provided no such option.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Also, please note, no person has voted for such an option.

My poll confirms that GW is universally hated.

Traditio do you own any miniatures bought from GW?

Yay! Fodder! Some people say "don't feed the trolls". I say " "

 Traditio wrote:

That would just be silly. Or not?

No reasonable person would select the "neither" option. Since the vote is an opinion, the answer is yes. Disagreement is not a sign of unreaonableness.

Thus the reason I have provided no such option. < Boys, this is what totalitarianism looks like. "I can't be wrong, so you don't need to chance to disagree"

Also, please note, no person has voted for such an option. "Nobody has voted for an option they could not select. Thus, that option has 0% favourability." Your poll is not measuring that aspect, and thus no valid comment can be made on such until a poll allows that selection.

My poll confirms that GW is universally hated. Illogical / misuse of biased datasets. See above comment.

Traditio wrote:Your ideal 40k ruleset will never come out.

GW is a horrible company.

They are actively opposing themselves to your interests.

They don't care about what you want the game to look like.

Every dollar you give to GW just furthers their ability to mock you and give you more rulesets that will anger you.

Boycott GW.

Traditio wrote:

MaxT wrote:
[MOD EDIT - RULE #1 - Alpharius]

Oh, how eloquent!

Such reason!

Such rhetorical extravagance!

[MOD EDIT - RULE #1 - Alpharius]

These two posts alone demonstrate one thing - You're not here to debate a topic - You're here in the hopes that people will jump on you bandwagon.

Is 8th Edition perfect? No - I think they overshot it and the best edition is somewhere in the middle ground of 7th and 8th (coming from someone who's only played those two editions).

You assume that the interests of any given customer is completely out of line with that of GW. This is false for one reason if nothing else: They're still in business!

If any given person is still giving GW their money, then they're clearly not angered, bothered, insulted, etc by what GW does overall.

And finally - If your response to someone is to talk like you're inside a Doge Meme, then can we really expect you to take this topic seriously (especially given your history on this forum)? Because this looks like nothing but trolling to me...

Selym:

My poll shows that roughly 86 percent of respondents agree that "Feth GW."

What is the point that you are trying to make?

Obvious majority is obvious.

 Traditio wrote:
Selym:

My poll shows that roughly 86 percent of respondents agree that "Feth GW."

What is the point that you are trying to make?

Obvious majority is obvious.

The point is that you have such a glaring methodological error that the poll is invalid. I mean, are you scared that if you allowed the option to vote differently you'd find that you are in the minority?

 Selym wrote:

 Traditio wrote:
Selym:

My poll shows that roughly 86 percent of respondents agree that "Feth GW."

What is the point that you are trying to make?

Obvious majority is obvious.

The point is that you have such a glaring methodological error that the poll is invalid. I mean, are you scared that if you allowed the option to vote differently you'd find that you are in the minority?

That's just silly.

Who would vote differently?

 Traditio wrote:

 Selym wrote:

 Traditio wrote:
Selym:

My poll shows that roughly 86 percent of respondents agree that "Feth GW."

What is the point that you are trying to make?

Obvious majority is obvious.

The point is that you have such a glaring methodological error that the poll is invalid. I mean, are you scared that if you allowed the option to vote differently you'd find that you are in the minority?

That's just silly.

Who would vote differently?

If that's the case, why not allow it? Sometimes you are in the wrong. And here I think you are.

 Traditio wrote:

That's just silly.

Who would vote differently?

Apparently... Me

The current votes is

Feth GW?
Indeed, Feth GW 88% [ 7 ]
Yea, verily: Feth GW 13% [ 1 ]
Total Votes : 8

I voted the second one since it had the word "Verily" in it.

Selym wrote:If that's the case, why not allow it? Sometimes you are in the wrong. And here I think you are.

Fully 8 people, as of the last time that I checked, voted that Feth GW.

What opposition?

What are you talking about, Selym?

All poll respondents agree with me.

Obviously.

 Traditio wrote:

Obviously.

The troll hath admitted defeat!

 Talamare wrote:

 Traditio wrote:

That's just silly.

Who would vote differently?

Apparently... Me

The current votes is

Feth GW?
Indeed, Feth GW 88% [ 7 ]
Yea, verily: Feth GW 13% [ 1 ]
Total Votes : 8

I voted the second one since it had the word "Verily" in it.

Then yea, verily, you agree with me:

Feth GW.

Wherein lies your disagreement?

Traditio wrote:

 Selym wrote:

 Traditio wrote:
Selym:

My poll shows that roughly 86 percent of respondents agree that "Feth GW."

What is the point that you are trying to make?

Obvious majority is obvious.

The point is that you have such a glaring methodological error that the poll is invalid. I mean, are you scared that if you allowed the option to vote differently you'd find that you are in the minority?

That's just silly.

Who would vote differently?

Why don't we see who would vote differently? I mean, as you say, if GW was so hated, then no-one would vote for it anyway, except "silly" people, as you put it.

I mean, it's not like you're afraid, is it?

So... that was a productive use of everyone's time.


Moving on.