Switch Theme:

Predator battle tanks - dakka or las, or a mix?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Omnipotent Necron Overlord






This is anecdotal but I was playing with chronus in an auto las pred vs Admech. He had a unit of 3 Robots that were laying down serious hurt on me. I first attempted to take them out with 2 vindicators. I got 4 hits and 3 wounds on them - then he made 2 4+ saves and I did 3 damage with the shot that got through. My auto las pred shot next. I got 5 shots with the auto cannon all hit and all wounded and he failed 3 saves. this did 9 wounds finishing off 2 robots. The las cannons were saved. After that I was pretty sold on the auto cannon. It has the same to wound roll and the save against ended up being the same because of the invulnerable. Essentailly vs targets like that the auto cannon is equal to 3.5 las cannons.

If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced.
- Fox Mulder 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut




I prefer the Lascannon Sponsons with Autocannon in this current edition. Solid shots, does enough damage towards bigger targets.

CaptainStabby wrote:
If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.

 jy2 wrote:
BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.

 vipoid wrote:
Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?

 MarsNZ wrote:
ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever.
 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




Agreed with auto cannon / laz sides from above. 2d3 str 7 3d shows is nothing to scoff at, it will tear lighter vehicles apart as well is bigger things if it has too. It's a flexible option that kicks butt. And side laz still gets you a serious punch factor.
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut






The ruins of the Palace of Thorns

I played a game where an opponent had three predators and could thus use the Killshot stratagem. He had all dakka preds, but the use of Killshot made them absolutely amazing.

Killshot would benefit Lascannons too, but not as much, as their volume of fire is lower.

Though guards may sleep and ships may lay at anchor, our foes know full well that big guns never tire.

Posting as Fifty_Painting on Instagram.

My blog - almost 40 pages of Badab War, Eldar, undead and other assorted projects 
   
Made in us
Missionary On A Mission



Eastern VA

I vote for auto/las, too. Quad las isn't a bad setup by any means, and if you know you'll only be fighting meaty stuff, especially T8 stuff, it's probably better. However, there are enough cases where the autocannon is potentially better, and few enough cases where it's massively worse, that I generally prefer the autolas configuration.

However, I will definitely second everyone who says that heavy bolter sponsons are crap. Heavy bolters, if you want them, are better taken on Razorbacks or even Devastator squads.

~4500 -- ~4000 -- ~2000 -- ~5000 -- ~5000 -- ~4000 
   
Made in de
Witch Hunter in the Shadows



Aachen

jade_angel wrote:
I vote for auto/las, too. Quad las isn't a bad setup by any means, and if you know you'll only be fighting meaty stuff, especially T8 stuff, it's probably better. However, there are enough cases where the autocannon is potentially better, and few enough cases where it's massively worse, that I generally prefer the autolas configuration.

However, I will definitely second everyone who says that heavy bolter sponsons are crap. Heavy bolters, if you want them, are better taken on Razorbacks or even Devastator squads.


Bolter sponsons are fine. They're OK for their price, and I wouldn't want them on a razorback ever. It's a more expensive platform to mount them on, and it suffers from wanting to move. TAC soften that by being heavy 12, and the cost as a total is only slightly more. Yes, they're better on a dev squad, but it's still a good option if you don't have points left to upgrade to lascannons. Just don't run your pred without any sponsons, that's the only thing you could do wrong.
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




Hb are in a bad spot, but not because they are bad. On a pred we prefer Lazer Cannons. On a razorback I prefer assault cannons. On a land speeder it's dual heavy flamers (I use them very aggressively). On an attack bike I don't know what I would pick, I don't use attack bikes, but it would probably be heavy bolters I suppose. Finally on devs or tacticals I prefer missile launchers for the added versatility. To be fair I do have a pred with hb's that I use with 2 others with laz canons. As a group of 3, the quad laz always gets killed first, then the auto laz, and the auto hb dies last. So yeah lol.
   
Made in de
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator






Hamburg

Compare vanilla Preds with Baal Predators.
As a BA player, my favorite loadout is the twin assault cannon with two heavy bolter sponons which makes 16 shots, 12 at S6 and 6 at S5.

Former moderator 40kOnline

Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!

Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a "" I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."

Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss 
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut






The ruins of the Palace of Thorns

 wuestenfux wrote:
Compare vanilla Preds with Baal Predators.
As a BA player, my favorite loadout is the twin assault cannon with two heavy bolter sponons which makes 16 shots, 12 at S6 and 6 at S5.


*cough*18 shots*cough*

Though guards may sleep and ships may lay at anchor, our foes know full well that big guns never tire.

Posting as Fifty_Painting on Instagram.

My blog - almost 40 pages of Badab War, Eldar, undead and other assorted projects 
   
Made in de
Witch Hunter in the Shadows



Aachen

 wuestenfux wrote:
Compare vanilla Preds with Baal Predators.
As a BA player, my favorite loadout is the twin assault cannon with two heavy bolter sponons which makes 16 shots, 12 at S6 and 6 at S5.


That makes 18 shots total though

The TAC has a clear and major range disadvantage compared to the predator ac. By having to move to get in range you're loosing 25% of your firepower, and S7 makes a difference versus most vehicles, too.
I don't think that makes the vanilla better, it's just that the Baal is a better anti infantry tank and therefore isn't as good versus other targets.
   
Made in de
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator






Hamburg

 Fifty wrote:
 wuestenfux wrote:
Compare vanilla Preds with Baal Predators.
As a BA player, my favorite loadout is the twin assault cannon with two heavy bolter sponons which makes 16 shots, 12 at S6 and 6 at S5.


*cough*18 shots*cough*

Sorry my math is off.

nekooni wrote:
 wuestenfux wrote:
Compare vanilla Preds with Baal Predators.
As a BA player, my favorite loadout is the twin assault cannon with two heavy bolter sponons which makes 16 shots, 12 at S6 and 6 at S5.


That makes 18 shots total though

The TAC has a clear and major range disadvantage compared to the predator ac. By having to move to get in range you're loosing 25% of your firepower, and S7 makes a difference versus most vehicles, too.
I don't think that makes the vanilla better, it's just that the Baal is a better anti infantry tank and therefore isn't as good versus other targets.

Indeed, the Baal is more anti-infantry.
It can be seen between the vanilla Pred and the Razorback with twin assault cannons.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/09/10 10:50:11


Former moderator 40kOnline

Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!

Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a "" I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."

Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss 
   
Made in us
Consigned to the Grim Darkness





USA

Assault cannon and heavy bolters, obviously.

The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog
 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: