Switch Theme:

Who got the better codex Vanilla or Dark Angels?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
    Subject: Advert
[Up]
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




[Post New] 2017/12/18 00:58:04
    Subject: Who got the better codex Vanilla or Dark Angels?
[Up]
Made in us
Wicked Warp Spider





Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
Once again you guys are basing that on one model.

It's like everyone ignores the Tyranid comparison I made.

I hate when this happens. Is like with the CSM in 6th and the mace prince.
If the strong model is nerfed or the meta changes, good night everybody.

This, of course, disregarding the fact that one would appreciate a codex that is way more than a monobuild.
And yet, for many, one broken combo is enough to make the codex good. If people don't like that specific model/playstyle/subfaction... well, that is their problem.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
tneva82 wrote:

Neither codex is really to be used alone anyway.

Also, we always been at war with Eastasia.

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2017/12/18 00:59:56

Generic characters disappearing? Elite units of your army losing options and customizations? No longer finding that motivation to convert?
Your army could suffer Post-Chapterhouse Stress Disorder (PCSD)! If you think that your army is suffering one or more of the aforementioned symptoms, call us at 789-666-1982 for a quick diagnosis! 
   
[Post New] 2017/12/18 02:24:56
    Subject: Who got the better codex Vanilla or Dark Angels?
[Up]
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut




 Kaiyanwang wrote:
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
Once again you guys are basing that on one model.

It's like everyone ignores the Tyranid comparison I made.

I hate when this happens. Is like with the CSM in 6th and the mace prince.
If the strong model is nerfed or the meta changes, good night everybody.

This, of course, disregarding the fact that one would appreciate a codex that is way more than a monobuild.
And yet, for many, one broken combo is enough to make the codex good. If people don't like that specific model/playstyle/subfaction... well, that is their problem.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
tneva82 wrote:

Neither codex is really to be used alone anyway.

Also, we always been at war with Eastasia.

Mace Prince became more fun with the Traitor Legions supplement that's for sure haha!
CaptainStabby wrote:
If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.

 jy2 wrote:
BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.

 vipoid wrote:
Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?

 MarsNZ wrote:
ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever.
 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: