Switch Theme:

Should Chapters use the 1000 Astartes only as a rough guideline?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Humming Great Unclean One of Nurgle






Hellebore wrote:
 NinthMusketeer wrote:
I feel like tabletop numbers are representative by necessity. Yeah it may seem like there are 60 guardsman on the board, but that is representative of a battle against 300+ guardsman. The IRL impracticality of 300+ guardsman means that the game itself needs to have less of them.


You can look at it like that but it also multiplies the casualties. If you lost 30 marines, that's 150 by your multiplication above....
As in certain 'swarmy' troops are representative of greater numbers but elite armies like marines are not. So 30 marines is 30 marines, the same amount of guardsman is hundreds.

Road to Renown! It's like classic Path to Glory, but repaired, remastered, expanded! https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/778170.page

I chose an avatar I feel best represents the quality of my post history.

I try to view Warhammer as more of a toolbox with examples than fully complete games. 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Background
Go to: