Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Id say its fine to run him as a knight, his proportions are just as off if you run him as another Thirster.

I own An'ggrath myself and 3 modern bloodthirsters.

Its a cool model, one of the very best of ENTIRE gw of ALL time in my oppinion. And FW rules for him are a spit in the face.

Definitely in the Bloodthirster camp as its specifically a model of a large demon and suitably armed, and judging by two images of both alongside Bloodletters the size difference isn't objectionable enough. Both bases appear to be the same size. Without a proper image of the two side-by-side I'd say its at best a "primaris bloodthirster".

Hey guy, here's a recent batrep with a chaos player using not one but two-count 'em!- two FW giant demon figures as greater demomsn in a 40k game.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dh-FcL5_x6E&t=1056s

So hey, knock yourself out.