Switch Theme:

GW’s pricing beneficial for competitors?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in de
Joined the Military for Authentic Experience






Nuremberg

The free market is a bad model because it assumes a load of stuff that is extremely rarely true.

Two assumptions of the model - that all people involved in the market have perfect information and that they make perfectly rational decisions in their own interest, are so obviously wrong that I'm really surprised anyone takes it that seriously as a model.

But I'm coming from a background where models with obviously wrong assumptions that produce predictions that don't match the measured outcomes are discarded.

   
Made in us
Inquisitorial Scourge of Heretics






Tapping the Glass at the Herpetarium

I do have to say... I've learned a lot from this thread.


 BorderCountess wrote:
Just because you're doing something right doesn't necessarily mean you know what you're doing...


"Vulkan: There will be no Rad or Phosphex in my legion. We shall fight wars humanely. Some things should be left in the dark age."
"Ferrus: Oh cool, when are you going to stop burning people to death?"
"Vulkan: I do not understand the question."

– A conversation between the X and XVIII Primarchs


 
   
 
Forum Index » Dakka Discussions
Go to: