Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/28 21:03:32
Subject: "Hiding" wounds inside other wounds.
|
 |
Sybarite Swinging an Agonizer
|
Take the following scenario as an example:
Let's say I have a squad of 5 Space Marines that are locked in close combat with some Genestealers. The Genestealers punch first and they do 5 regular wounds and 2 rending wounds. Are you allowed to allocate wounds that allows you to "hide" the rending wounds? Rending wounds will automatically kill a Space Marine as they only have one wound and no invulernable save, so can the Space Marine player allocate his wounds like this:
M1: Rend, Wound
M2: Rend, Wound
M3: Wound
M4: Wound
M5: Wound
Thus, making it where the Space Marine player only needs to take 3 armor saves? It seems really awkward that a player can do this in order to bypass two of the saves he has to make from the regular wounds?
What if, instead of rending, the two wounds we're instant death wounds caused by a special ability? Not necessarily double-your-toughness instant death, but a special rule (like Skulltaker, for example)? Can the player hide regular wounds inside of the "instant-death" wounds in order to prevent having to take armour saves?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/06/28 21:04:25
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/28 21:08:33
Subject: "Hiding" wounds inside other wounds.
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
If the marines are all the same, you don't allocate the wounds. In your example, you would roll 5 saves, and then remove a model for each failed save and for the 2 rending wounds.
Assuming that you are allocating, though... it comes down to the specific example.
Wounds aren't applied to models until you have rolled saves. You allocate to individual models, but then you roll saves and remove the casualties as a group. So whether or not the extra wounds are being 'hidden' here depends on how many of those marines are the same.
If all five were different, so each rolled their saves separately, then the second wound applied to each of the guys with a rending wound would indeed be 'lost'
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/28 21:09:44
Subject: "Hiding" wounds inside other wounds.
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
You are missing a step.
1) Assign wounding hits to models
2) Group wounding hits into groups of LIKE models; i.e. like in game terms
3) Take saves as a group
So yes, if you had 2 unique marines, e.g. sarge and special weapon, then you can assign both rending wounding hits to those two models and the other 3 marines would only take "normal" wounding hits.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/28 21:12:38
Subject: "Hiding" wounds inside other wounds.
|
 |
Thinking of Joining a Davinite Loge
|
If the marines are all the same then you still have to take all 5 armor saves. IIRC
|
Jidmah wrote:That's why I keep my enemies close and my AOBR rulebook closer.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/28 21:18:22
Subject: Re:"Hiding" wounds inside other wounds.
|
 |
Sybarite Swinging an Agonizer
|
Sorry, I forgot to add the stipulation that all of the marines are unique. So, you can do this with instant death wounds as well?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/28 21:22:38
Subject: Re:"Hiding" wounds inside other wounds.
|
 |
Speedy Swiftclaw Biker
|
The first question is: Is this a complex unit? If so, the following would occur.
Page 25 BRB [Complex Units]
Para. 4 [The player must allocate one wound to each model in the target unit before he can allocate a second wound to the same model.]
Some details will continue on pg. 25 about how those things work too, if you have further questions.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/28 21:23:26
Subject: "Hiding" wounds inside other wounds.
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
Kurce wrote: So, you can do this with instant death wounds as well?
Yes.
Alternatively, if they're all unique, you could have put two normal wounds onto M1, and both rending/ ID wounds onto M2.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/06/28 21:24:06
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/28 22:24:41
Subject: "Hiding" wounds inside other wounds.
|
 |
Blood Angel Terminator with Lightning Claws
|
OK, how do you get 5 marines from a tact squad to be unique? I can get 4 but not 5.
|
On Dakka he was Eldanar. In our area, he was Lee. R.I.P., Lee Guthrie. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/28 22:26:35
Subject: "Hiding" wounds inside other wounds.
|
 |
Mounted Kroot Tracker
|
jbunny wrote:OK, how do you get 5 marines from a tact squad to be unique? I can get 4 but not 5.
You can't. You don't have the option to give them all separate wargear. The wound allocation rules only heavily come into play when facing diversified Nobz, command squads, honour guard, etc.
|
Night Watch SM
Kroot Mercenaries W 2 - D 3 - L 1
Manchu wrote: This is simply a self-fulfilling prophecy. Everyone says, "it won't change so why should I bother to try?" and then it doesn't change so people feel validated in their bad behavior.
Nightwatch's Kroot Blog
DQ:90-S++G++M-B++I+Pw40k08#+D+A--/cWD-R+T(S)DM+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/28 22:53:25
Subject: "Hiding" wounds inside other wounds.
|
 |
Blood Angel Terminator with Lightning Claws
|
I only asked because the OP said they were.
|
On Dakka he was Eldanar. In our area, he was Lee. R.I.P., Lee Guthrie. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/28 22:54:35
Subject: "Hiding" wounds inside other wounds.
|
 |
Bonkers Buggy Driver with Rockets
|
from the example you listed, provided they are diverse, he could have put both rending wounds on one marine, and taken saves on the other 4.
Rend w w w w
Rend w
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/06/28 22:55:05
- 3000 pts
- 3000 pts
- 3000 pts
- 7500 pts
- 2000 pts
- 2500 pts
3850 pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/29 02:49:36
Subject: Re:"Hiding" wounds inside other wounds.
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Well in the OP example you cant but if it was a sergeant flamer and 3 normal marines you could put both rends on the flamer and take the other saves on the other marines and sergeant
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/29 03:15:44
Subject: "Hiding" wounds inside other wounds.
|
 |
Numberless Necron Warrior
|
Sounds cheesy. No wonder mixed Nobs are so powerful. Typically, we do wounds with no armor save first, and then armor saves. But that might have to change.
|
Life Sucks Press On.
In order of collection:
Space Marines
Necrons
Renegade Guardsmen
Dark Eldar |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/29 03:17:24
Subject: "Hiding" wounds inside other wounds.
|
 |
[ARTICLE MOD]
Fixture of Dakka
|
If you had one marine who was different, you could put both rends on him, and take five saves over the other four guys, basically burying a rend.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|