| Poll |
 |
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
|
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2010/07/09 05:59:44
Subject: Which looks better?
|
|
Implacable Skitarii
|
Well like the title says which chaos lord looks better, fantasy of 40k?
Warhammer fantasy
or
warhammer 40,000
|
You know you're spending too much time on 40k when... you worry about the Gets Hot! rule when turning on a plasma tv. - frightenedfreddie 
原子炉へつれていって。 |
|
|
 |
|
2010/07/09 06:29:22
Subject: Which looks better?
|
|
Tunneling Trygon
|
Why?
|
|
|
|
|
2010/07/09 06:34:26
Subject: Re:Which looks better?
|
|
Reverent Tech-Adept
The World of Cheese and Snack foods
|
Above Post
Also, i chose the fantasy lord because i always had a liking for dark red armor,
While the 40k one is to bright for my eyes. It maybe the lighting but im not sure.
|
 Red Skined Orks 1750 And counting
 Space marine Vanilla-His wrathful gaze
Uncountable number |
|
|
|
|
2010/07/09 06:47:35
Subject: Re:Which looks better?
|
|
Baying Member of the Mob
|
Fantasy lord by far. It captures that sinister look you want in a lord of Chaos. The 40k one, while painted well, is just.. too bright for my taste.
|
|
|
|
|
2010/07/09 08:00:22
Subject: Which looks better?
|
|
Utilizing Careful Highlighting
Finland... the country next to Sweden? No! That's Norway! Finland is to the east! No! That's Russia!
|
Fantasy lord definetly (with a 40k touch)
|
Sweet Jesus, Nurgle and Slaanesh in the same box!?
No, just Nurgle and Slaanesh, Jesus will be sold seperately in a blister.
|
|
|
|
|
2010/07/09 08:02:09
Subject: Which looks better?
|
|
Bryan Ansell
|
Paint job for fantasy mini for 40K.
|
|
|
|
|
2010/07/09 19:38:18
Subject: Which looks better?
|
|
Pauper with Promise
|
I have to go with fantasy. Always thought fantasy chaos looked much better than 40k chaos.
|
|
|
|
|
2010/07/09 19:42:53
Subject: Which looks better?
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
This isn't a good comparison, so I don't feel comfortable voting.
With those two specific models with those two specific paintjobs, the fantasy one looks better, but that's not true for all possibilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010/07/09 19:44:06
Subject: Which looks better?
|
|
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge
|
The Fantasy mini is newer and painted in a more modern style. The 40k Lord came out in 3rd edition and has a really bright paint job reflecting that fact. I like the 40k lord better, as he looks more like a lord than just an aspiring champion.
|
Check out my Youtube channel!
 |
|
|
|
|
2010/07/09 22:57:34
Subject: Which looks better?
|
|
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
Better for what?
As a straight up comparison, I like the Fantasy guy better.
As a 40K Lord, I like the 40K guy better. Although the Fantasy one would probably make a better lord after a little cosmetic work 
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010/07/09 23:10:12
Subject: Which looks better?
|
|
Lord of the Fleet
|
Fantasy Lord, although I also have a liking for the 40K one.
|
|
|
|
|
2010/07/09 23:22:50
Subject: Which looks better?
|
|
Pestilent Plague Marine with Blight Grenade
|
Ugh, I absolutely loathe the Fantasy Lord's helmet - gotta cast my vote with the 40K Lord.
|
Triggerbaby wrote:In summary, here's your lunch and ask Miss Creaver if she has aloe lotion because I have taken you to school and you have been burned.
Abadabadoobaddon wrote:I too can prove pretty much any assertion I please if I don't count all the evidence that contradicts it.
|
|
|
|
|
2010/07/09 23:27:43
Subject: Re:Which looks better?
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
My vote is for the fantasy figure. I like the red on it and the pose looks cool.
|
|
|
|
|
2010/07/09 23:29:52
Subject: Which looks better?
|
|
Rough Rider with Boomstick
|
I hate almost all guys without helmets, so the vote auto-goes to the fantasy one.
|
I have 2000 points of  , called the Crimson Leaves.
I will soon be starting WoC, devoted to 
I have 500 points of  , in blueberry and ice cream (light grey and light blue) flavour. From the fictional world Darkheim.
DarkHound wrote:Stop it you. Core has changed. It's no longer about nations, ideologies or ethnicity. It's an endless series of proxy battles, fought by mercenaries and machines. Core, and its consumption of life, has become a well-oiled machine. Core has changed. ID tagged soldiers carry ID tagged weapons, use ID tagged gear. Nanomachines inside their bodies enhance and regulate their abilities. Genetic control. Information control. Emotion control. Battlefield control. Everything is monitored, and kept under control. Core has changed. The age of deterrence has become the age of control. All in the name of averting catastrophe from weapons of mass destruction. And he who controls the battlefield, controls history. Core has changed. When the battlefield is under total control, war... becomes routine.
|
|
|
|
|
2010/07/10 11:39:57
Subject: Which looks better?
|
|
Daemonic Dreadnought
|
Ideally - the Fantasy lord with the 40k gun arm woudl be sweet. I especially liek the axe on the fantasy model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010/07/10 16:25:55
Subject: Which looks better?
|
|
Death-Dealing Devastator
|
fantasy! but you should convert him to look 40k-esque
|
 tyranid 2000+
 Hawk Lords 2000+
 Ulthwe 2000+
 Dark Eldar 1700
 Daemonettes 2000+
 Guard 3000+ |
|
|
|
|
2010/07/10 17:37:49
Subject: Which looks better?
|
|
Obergefreiter
Massachusetts
|
I voted the Fantasy model. However, the 40k one might be cooler if he had a helmet on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Iron Warriors) 
