Switch Theme:

Spliting 40k Proposed rules  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in au
Longtime Dakkanaut







I've noticed that proposed rules gets 2 kinds of elements that serve relatively distinct roles:

Unique units/rules

Codex revamps/modifiers (this includes BRB complaints)

I find that one group generally drowns the other out depending on the season such that genuinely good ideas disappear.
My suggestion is to sub-subforum these two groups apart, so that those gems don't get lost in the ether.

"There's a difference between bein' a smartboy and bein' a smart git, Gimzod." - Rogue Skwadron, the Big Push

My Current army lineup 
   
Made in gb
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut






London, UK

There is not really enough traffic in that forum to justify a split yet, but we will keep it in mind.

Check out our new, fully plastic tabletop wargame - Maelstrom's Edge, made by Dakka!
 
   
 
Forum Index » Nuts & Bolts
Go to: