Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Hey everyone,
A thought cam across my mind the other day while I was reading some fluff, the definition of Lexicanum includes "...field of energy which disrupts solid matter, allowing the weapon to easily tear through armour..." Now, as to my question, Why don't power swords have 2d6 armour penetration against vehicles, a balance thing maybe? I mean, they are meant to be able to rip through Terminator armour which is meant to be able to survive a lascanon hit to the face, what do you all think about it?

This has been done before. A search will provide you with detailed arguaments for both sides.

DakkaDakka wrote: