| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/10/21 04:39:11
Subject: Are Chaos terminators relentless?
|
 |
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight
|
In this thread http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/323595.page
It was said that CSM termies are not relentless, and no one disagreed. Are they?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/10/21 04:43:27
Subject: Are Chaos terminators relentless?
|
 |
Shas'o Commanding the Hunter Kadre
|
They may move and fire heavy weapons, and assault after doing so plus after using rapid fire. Check the terminator armor section on page 86. Not relentless, but close.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/10/21 04:45:40
Subject: Are Chaos terminators relentless?
|
 |
Martial Arts Fiday
|
The only difference is they may not fire Rapid Fire weapons as stationary, on the move.
|
"Holy Sh*&, you've opened my eyes and changed my mind about this topic, thanks Dakka OT!"
-Nobody Ever
Proverbs 18:2
"CHEESE!" is the battlecry of the ill-prepared.
warboss wrote:
GW didn't mean to hit your wallet and I know they love you, baby. I'm sure they won't do it again so it's ok to purchase and make up. 
Albatross wrote:I think SlaveToDorkness just became my new hero.
EmilCrane wrote:Finecast is the new Matt Ward.
Don't mess with the Blade and Bolter! |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/10/21 04:58:15
Subject: Are Chaos terminators relentless?
|
 |
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight
|
Thank you slave, you are a good person.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/10/21 04:58:37
Subject: Are Chaos terminators relentless?
|
 |
Martial Arts Fiday
|
Awww, shucks....
|
"Holy Sh*&, you've opened my eyes and changed my mind about this topic, thanks Dakka OT!"
-Nobody Ever
Proverbs 18:2
"CHEESE!" is the battlecry of the ill-prepared.
warboss wrote:
GW didn't mean to hit your wallet and I know they love you, baby. I'm sure they won't do it again so it's ok to purchase and make up. 
Albatross wrote:I think SlaveToDorkness just became my new hero.
EmilCrane wrote:Finecast is the new Matt Ward.
Don't mess with the Blade and Bolter! |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/10/21 06:49:31
Subject: Are Chaos terminators relentless?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
No they are not.
The only difference is as Slave says.
|
There's just an acre of you fellas, isn't there? |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/10/21 09:02:19
Subject: Re:Are Chaos terminators relentless?
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
Where does it say that? I just read the rules on page 86 of the CSM codex and I didn't see anything about not firing Rapid Fire weapons as stationary, when they've moved. I always thought they could. If they can't that really diminishes the use of deep striking them. Deepstriking counts as movement, so you couldn't deepstrike and fire your bolters (or combi-plasmas) on the same turn they deep strike. Well you could, but you could only shoot 12" Is that correct?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/10/21 09:03:29
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/10/21 09:17:49
Subject: Are Chaos terminators relentless?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
That is correct.
When they put the rules for terminators into the codex,rather than the main rulebook, in preparation for 5th ed, they left out the "fire as stationary"
Most people i know, including in tournaments, are MORE Than happy to play it as them having true relentless, however, chalking it up to yet more GW bad writing.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|