Switch Theme:

The problem of space marine protagonism being conflated with skill  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard





 Da Boss wrote:
I think it's a shame there's not more editorial control exercised on the book writers writing crazy stuff for Marines which is then taken as 100% inviolable truth by fans.
That's not the problem. The protagonists will always have plot armor. The problem is not that Sergeant Pasanius has plot armor and super skills. The problem is the people who can't tell the difference between Sergeant Pasanius, and that Assault Marine there on the left who just took a lascannon to what used to be his face. There are two kinds of characters in these kinds of bookst. The ones who get names, and the ones who die easy.
The argument that the game is secondary to the books is bonkers to me - it was a game first, it remains a game, and the game is much more consistent through it's existence than the novels.

The rot has set in at the game level by now as well though, so I'm on a hiding to nothing complaining about it.

I don't understand the appeal of this powerscaling stuff at all. I always thought the Ork "Biggest Ork is the Leader" stuff was poking fun at this sort of thing, but the Imperium works on this logic now too and no one seems to think it's ridiculous.


Its both ridiculous and not. Its human nature. Ever play an MMO? Is the raid target 60 feet tall (relative to your six foot tall avatar)? Ever see a raid target that was and stayed halfling size? How often? Its human nature.

My WHFB armies were Bretonians and Tomb Kings. 
   
Made in de
Veteran Knight Baron in a Crusader




Bamberg / Erlangen

Breton wrote:

Its both ridiculous and not. Its human nature. Ever play an MMO? Is the raid target 60 feet tall (relative to your six foot tall avatar)? Ever see a raid target that was and stayed halfling size? How often? Its human nature.

MMO bosses need to be tall so they are visible under the VFX of 40 people and their nameplates.

They also need to be tall/strong for the immersion of being a challenge. A frail Gnome mage being pummeled would look silly and unbelievable.

I don't think this is comparable to the scale creep in a miniature game.

Custom40k Homebrew - Alternate activation, huge customisation, support for all models from 3rd to 10th edition

Designer's Note: Hardened Veterans can be represented by any Imperial Guard models, but we've really included them to allow players to practise their skills at making a really unique and individual unit. Because of this we won't be making models to represent many of the options allowed to a Veteran squad - it's up to you to convert the models. (Imperial Guard, 3rd Edition) 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





 vipoid wrote:

But if anything that just reinforces the point - if Space Marines are basically walking armour, then what meaningful distinction is their between their armour and their "toughness"?


I think its initially supposed to be more of a strength test and less focused on the toughness aspect. An old aspect of the game's RPG roots where you'd roll to see if you passed your accuracy check, then roll to see if you pass your strength test and then your opponent gets to react to save themselves with a dodge or shield or passive armor or something. The names are a little clunky; particularly in how "armor save" works, but that's the original reason that's mostly just stuck around because it mechanically worked.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
 alextroy wrote:

Regardless, all Chaos Space Marine who have not ascended to Daemon Prince are mortal in they die from outside forces and stay dead. This is where the entire 40K setting becomes a bit silly. None of the numbers presented make sense. Given how few Space Marines (Loyalist and Chaos) there are, they die far too quickly for them to still exist given their replenishment rate.


This is extremely common from any sort of sci fi. The actual scale of space is impossible to really comprehend in a way that results if anything logistically viable. You just end up making up giant nonsense numbers and then learning that you have a fraction of a percent of what's actually needed for a cosmic scale.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2025/09/15 16:18:40


 
   
Made in au
Longtime Dakkanaut





Karol wrote:
Space Marines have bones laces with cermite from the food paste they eat. And the older they are the more cermite in bones they have. Not counting the parts of the bones replaced with metal bits of course. The black carapace is also part of a subdermal armour. And it is not just marines. Imperial assasins have it too. And only GW knows how custodes function, because their lore keeps getting changed.

Also pure mechanics wise. Both chaos and imperial knights should have "toughness" too.


None of those from my recollection have their bones on the outside where the bullet would hit before entering their bodies...

Resilient bones equals more wounds to resist death, it doesn't stop bullets getting into you.

   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: