Switch Theme:

Is there any such thing as a 'Target Priority Test'?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in ca
Frightening Flamer of Tzeentch





South Korea

My friend says that there is a target priority test where you have to take a leadership test if you want to shoot at a target father than the nearest target to you. I can't find anything of that in the glossary of the rulebook, or the leadership or shooting sections. His Tau codex makes references to needing to take these tests, and that's where we got the idea from. So...is there such a thing? Is it a Tau only rule or a rule that was eliminated in the new codex? Or am I just missing the rule somewhere?

 
   
Made in gb
Lord of the Fleet






London

Tell him to play 5th Edition. Any reference to Targer Priority should be ignored as it was abolished with the introduction of 5th.
   
Made in au
[MOD]
Making Stuff






Under the couch

...Except for Black Templars, who are still bound by it. See the BT FAQ for details.

 
   
Made in us
Shas'o Commanding the Hunter Kadre





Richmond, VA

Tau still have wargear that lets them get around a non-existent rule, just remember that regarding this.

Desert Hunters of Vior'la The Purge Iron Hands Adepts of Pestilence Tallaran Desert Raiders Grey Knight Teleport Assault Force
Lt. Coldfire wrote:Seems to me that you should be refereeing and handing out red cards--like a boss.

 Peregrine wrote:
SCREEE I'M A SEAGULL SCREE SCREEEE!!!!!
 
   
Made in gb
Plummeting Black Templar Thunderhawk Pilot






Yeah BT still have to take target priority. Which sucks.

Oh well, more excuses to take close combat weapons!

Please check out my video battle report series! 50 games in 50 weeks!

Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLF20FCCD695F810C2&feature=edit_ok
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL36388662C07B319B&feature=view_all
Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrPdNlJMge2eUv55aJag2cMj4znP8YfOT&feature=view_all
Part 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxrTKHXULnQ&list=PLrPdNlJMge2cN6_lo1RbXvbvFZbto5wXB

=====Begin Dakka Geek Code=====
DQ: 80+S+++G+++MB+I+Pw40k98#+D+++A++++/cWD-R+++T(G)DM+
======End Dakka Geek Code======
 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





Los Angeles

juraigamer wrote:Tau still have wargear that lets them get around a non-existent rule, just remember that regarding this.
The other thing to add, is when infantry, like Broadsides, are using Target Locks, it was necessary to make a Target Priority test in 4e before the TL model could split its fire. Now, your opponent should just split his fire without worrying about TP.

"You can bring any cheesy unit you want. If you lose. Casey taught me that." -Tim S.

"I'm gonna follow Casey; he knows where the beer's at!" -Blackmoor, BAO 2013

Quitting Daemon Princes, Bob and Fred - a 40k webcomic 
   
Made in gb
Emboldened Warlock







As has been answered, your friend hasnt read the new rulebook.

If you ever think someone is making up a rule/spouts something that doesnt seem right, ask them to point out the rule in the rulebook/codex.

DC:80S++G++M+B++I+Pw40k99+D++A+++/mWD219R++T(T)DM+ 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: