Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/13 22:07:00
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Hardened Veteran Guardsman
|
Would a Leman Russ Executioner w/ lascannon and plasma cannon sponsons be worth 245 points when going up against necrons?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/13 22:13:00
Subject: Re:Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Nervous Accuser
|
I would say that everything except the lascannon is worth it, its expensive enough as it is. Though I do neither play Imperial Guard or Necrons so my opinion might be faulty*shrugs*, but I can see no huge benefit of a lascannon, the thing already got enough firepower to hammer down most squads.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/13 22:38:21
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Plastictrees
|
Yes, do the heavy flamer on the hull instead. It's cheaper, and a better gun to have if your opponent sends a bunch of scarab swarms to try and get you with disruptor fields (A heavy flamer auto-hits scarabs, wounds them on 2s, allows no cover or armor saves, and causes 2 wounds per base hit).
|
"The complete or partial destruction of the enemy must be regarded as the sole object of all engagements.... Direct annihilation of the enemy's forces must always be the dominant consideration." Karl von Clausewitz |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/13 22:43:03
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Numberless Necron Warrior
|
Lose the Lascannon. Heavy Bolter is fine. Lascannon is best on Russes that are hunting tanks. When it comes to Necrons, you want to force as many saves as you can (or just kill em in close combat.) Usually they will have a lord in close proximity. If they don't, the Russ will hurt squads. If they do, you are at least going to force saves. The Lascannon will not add anything extra with an executioner. It will only soak up points. Better to use those points somewhere else.
|
Life Sucks Press On.
In order of collection:
Space Marines
Necrons
Renegade Guardsmen
Dark Eldar |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/13 22:45:55
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Stalwart Veteran Guard Sergeant
|
I agree with the earlier, drop the Lascannon and go with either heavy bolter or flamer, either will still do well against necrons. Personally I find the Executioner to pretty much ruin any meqs day. Fancy armor and toughness don't mean a whole lot against all those plasma shots.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/13 22:49:32
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw
|
doesnt matter if the lord is there or not, they'll get WBB rolls from plasma cannons.
IMO battle cannons are better in this case, just take a squadron of 2 russes be a little more but dish out some wounds that they won't get wbb from unless they're close to a res orb ...
or are T5+
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/13 22:51:56
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Rogue Daemonhunter fueled by Chaos
|
When are necrons not within range of a res orb?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/13 22:55:12
Subject: Re:Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Hardened Veteran Guardsman
|
when they are 6 inch's away from it
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/14 00:33:19
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Fully-charged Electropriest
|
jdjamesdean@mail.com wrote:doesnt matter if the lord is there or not, they'll get WBB rolls from plasma cannons.
IMO battle cannons are better in this case, just take a squadron of 2 russes be a little more but dish out some wounds that they won't get wbb from unless they're close to a res orb ...
or are T5+
WBB doesn't work against plasma cannons unless there is a res orb nearby, and there should always be a res orb nearby
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/14 00:35:37
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine
|
prime12357 wrote:jdjamesdean@mail.com wrote:doesnt matter if the lord is there or not, they'll get WBB rolls from plasma cannons.
IMO battle cannons are better in this case, just take a squadron of 2 russes be a little more but dish out some wounds that they won't get wbb from unless they're close to a res orb ...
or are T5+
WBB doesn't work against plasma cannons unless there is a res orb nearby, and there should always be a res orb nearby
yes it does
Is it strength double the toughness of the necron-no wbb is allowed
|
H.B.M.C. wrote:
"Balance, playtesting - a casual gamer craves not these things!" - Yoda, a casual gamer.
Three things matter in marksmanship -
location, location, locationMagickalMemories wrote:How about making another fist?
One can be, "Da Fist uv Mork" and the second can be, "Da Uvver Fist uv Mork."
Make a third, and it can be, "Da Uvver Uvver Fist uv Mork"
Eric |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/14 00:37:19
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw
|
prime12357 wrote:jdjamesdean@mail.com wrote:doesnt matter if the lord is there or not, they'll get WBB rolls from plasma cannons.
IMO battle cannons are better in this case, just take a squadron of 2 russes be a little more but dish out some wounds that they won't get wbb from unless they're close to a res orb ...
or are T5+
WBB doesn't work against plasma cannons unless there is a res orb nearby, and there should always be a res orb nearby
Somebody is getting WBB and FNP confused ...
Necrons do get WBB from plasma as it's only str 7
WBB cares not about the AP
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/14 01:15:47
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Numberless Necron Warrior
|
WBB is negated by AP1 or AP2, since it is something that ignores all armor saves. At least that is how it has been explained to me time and time again.
|
Life Sucks Press On.
In order of collection:
Space Marines
Necrons
Renegade Guardsmen
Dark Eldar |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/14 01:21:00
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Pestilent Plague Marine with Blight Grenade
|
headrattle wrote:WBB is negated by AP1 or AP2, since it is something that ignores all armor saves. At least that is how it has been explained to me time and time again.
That's Feel no Pain. The AP value has no bearing on WBB - only if it is a close combat weapon that ignores armour saves, or if the strength of the weapon is twice the Necron model's toughness.
|
Triggerbaby wrote:In summary, here's your lunch and ask Miss Creaver if she has aloe lotion because I have taken you to school and you have been burned.
Abadabadoobaddon wrote:I too can prove pretty much any assertion I please if I don't count all the evidence that contradicts it. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/14 16:04:22
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Drop Trooper with Demo Charge
Norfolk (the UK one)
|
MinMax has this right. Thats why in this instance WBB is better than FNP
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/14 16:21:48
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
Does your opponent take alot of Destroyers? I ran three lascannons in my army once (two on a single land raider and one on a Dreadnought) and they were crutial to my victory, as all three managed to destroy his Destroyers, and since I destroyed them all in one go, he didnt get his WBB roll. same goes for Heavy Destroyers, who tend to be loners and are easy pickings for Lascannons. Otherwise, Heavy Bolters all the way.
|
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/14 16:23:33
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw
|
headrattle wrote:WBB is negated by AP1 or AP2, since it is something that ignores all armor saves. At least that is how it has been explained to me time and time again.
well than stop letting them cheat you time and time again, WBB is far more annoying than that
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/14 16:31:49
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Arch Magos w/ 4 Meg of RAM
|
MechaEmperor7000 wrote:Does your opponent take alot of Destroyers? I ran three lascannons in my army once (two on a single land raider and one on a Dreadnought) and they were crutial to my victory, as all three managed to destroy his Destroyers, and since I destroyed them all in one go, he didnt get his WBB roll. same goes for Heavy Destroyers, who tend to be loners and are easy pickings for Lascannons. Otherwise, Heavy Bolters all the way.
aren't destroyers T5, not T4(5) ?
|
Godforge custom 3d printing / professional level casting masters and design:
https://www.etsy.com/shop/GodForge |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/14 16:42:41
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
Unless he has a Tomb Spyder, if there are no Destroyers within 6 inches during WBB roll, the Destroyers cannot revive even if a Res-Orb is nearby. If all Destroyers are wiped off the field (and Heavy Destroyers do not count as Destroyers for this purpose, and vice versa) then they cannot revive at all even if there is a Tomb Spyder.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/12/14 16:43:16
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/14 20:53:08
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Arch Magos w/ 4 Meg of RAM
|
ah
My local necron player takes full squads of destroyers, so 3 lascannons wiping a squad didnt really make sense.
|
Godforge custom 3d printing / professional level casting masters and design:
https://www.etsy.com/shop/GodForge |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/14 21:17:12
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Grundz wrote:My local necron player takes full squads of destroyers, so 3 lascannons wiping a squad didnt really make sense.
INcidentally, just one more thing a Leman Russ Executioner would be great for...
|
There's just an acre of you fellas, isn't there? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/14 22:17:46
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
Remember that you need to wipe the whole squad in one go or inflict massive casualties, but preferably in one go. With all Destroyers dead, you will certainly have put them down, whereas a single surviving Destroyer means that statistically half your efforts just went to waste.
|
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/14 23:07:09
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
A regular russ will probably be better (or a basilisk, for that matter). Once your opponent realises how to space his warriors properly, the executioner's value will plunge, and if he like deepstriking in a monolith and teleporting dudes out, guess what will be his first target? Yeah, the lone executioner. Better to take two regular russes which stand up to proper spacing better, and provide two seperate targets, making it less likely that your opponent will be able to shut down all your firepower in a single go.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/15 00:26:45
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot
|
Yeah, redundant tank is already redundant enough without a Lascannon. Although redundancy can be good in some cases.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/17 23:28:33
Subject: Re:Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
Leeds, England
|
Personally I like the Heavy bolter. 36'' range and strength 6 with 3 shots. Quite simmiller to the plasma cannons. Does well against some of the executioners targets but not all. MC'S, infantry and light vehicles. Won't do as well against termies but against nercrons I don't think either weapon will make too much difference so why pay an extra 15 points? I only go for Lascannons in the hull if I want the tank to be multi purpose or a tank hunter. That way I can use the Lumbering behemoth rule to get two decent AT shots and have it as a back-up weapon incase the turret gets taken out.
|
Statistically, you will almost certainly die when assaulting a well-maintained fortress with a competent commander. You must strive to make your death useful.
Your foe is well equipped, well-trained, battle-hardened. He believes his gods are on his side. Let him believe what he will. We have the tanks on ours.
I hate last stands, there's never time to practise them - Major Rawne - Tanith First |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/17 23:48:46
Subject: Re:Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Guard Heavy Weapon Crewman
Somewhere over the South Pacific
|
Deceiver wrote:Personally I like the Heavy bolter. 36'' range and strength 6 with 3 shots. Quite simmiller to the plasma cannons. Does well against some of the executioners targets but not all. MC'S, infantry and light vehicles. Won't do as well against termies but against nercrons I don't think either weapon will make too much difference so why pay an extra 15 points? I only go for Lascannons in the hull if I want the tank to be multi purpose or a tank hunter. That way I can use the Lumbering behemoth rule to get two decent AT shots and have it as a back-up weapon incase the turret gets taken out.
That's... welll... gamebreaking. A HB has str 5. You must've confused it with the apocalyptic vulcan mega bolter
|
Well the world isn't going to take over its' self now is it? And what kind of achievement will that be without fashionable henchmen? Normally this wouldn't have been a problem, but I had all my fashion designers executed.
Should anyone help design a new flashy uniform, I just might spare you on the day of judgement. MUHAHAHA!
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/336897.page |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/18 00:14:40
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight
|
Grundz wrote:MechaEmperor7000 wrote:Does your opponent take alot of Destroyers? I ran three lascannons in my army once (two on a single land raider and one on a Dreadnought) and they were crutial to my victory, as all three managed to destroy his Destroyers, and since I destroyed them all in one go, he didnt get his WBB roll. same goes for Heavy Destroyers, who tend to be loners and are easy pickings for Lascannons. Otherwise, Heavy Bolters all the way.
aren't destroyers T5, not T4(5) ?
Destroyers are T6 I believe.
|
DQ:70+S++G+M-B+I+Pw40k93+ID++A+/eWD156R++T(T)DM++
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/18 10:26:54
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Hurr! Ogryn Bone 'Ead!
CT
|
augustus5 wrote:Grundz wrote:MechaEmperor7000 wrote:Does your opponent take alot of Destroyers? I ran three lascannons in my army once (two on a single land raider and one on a Dreadnought) and they were crutial to my victory, as all three managed to destroy his Destroyers, and since I destroyed them all in one go, he didnt get his WBB roll. same goes for Heavy Destroyers, who tend to be loners and are easy pickings for Lascannons. Otherwise, Heavy Bolters all the way.
aren't destroyers T5, not T4(5) ?
Destroyers are T6 I believe.
Destroyers are T5 and that is their base toughness so only s10 will prevent those WBB saves from shooting (or you can just wipe em out to do that too.)
Washington Irving wrote:
That's... welll... gamebreaking. A HB has str 5. You must've confused it with the apocalyptic vulcan mega bolter
I think Deceiver might have confused the Executioner with the Exterminator which has a 4 shot autocannon for a main gun making it pair up better with the heavy bolter. Although heavy bolters are s5 not s6 so maybe I am wrong?
Cheers,
~Volkan
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/18 18:57:54
Subject: Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw
|
Aye, the t6 is the Lord on a Destroyer Body
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/18 20:36:12
Subject: Re:Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
Leeds, England
|
Washington Irving wrote:Deceiver wrote:Personally I like the Heavy bolter. 36'' range and strength 6 with 3 shots. Quite simmiller to the plasma cannons. Does well against some of the executioners targets but not all. MC'S, infantry and light vehicles. Won't do as well against termies but against nercrons I don't think either weapon will make too much difference so why pay an extra 15 points? I only go for Lascannons in the hull if I want the tank to be multi purpose or a tank hunter. That way I can use the Lumbering behemoth rule to get two decent AT shots and have it as a back-up weapon incase the turret gets taken out.
That's... welll... gamebreaking. A HB has str 5. You must've confused it with the apocalyptic vulcan mega bolter
Lol my bad ^.^
|
Statistically, you will almost certainly die when assaulting a well-maintained fortress with a competent commander. You must strive to make your death useful.
Your foe is well equipped, well-trained, battle-hardened. He believes his gods are on his side. Let him believe what he will. We have the tanks on ours.
I hate last stands, there's never time to practise them - Major Rawne - Tanith First |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/18 23:19:33
Subject: Re:Leman Russ Executioner
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
I have both. That said, i have ran the HB armed ones all of the time except for the first time i tried one out.
it usually comes down to points for me.
|
"But i'm more than just a little curious, how you're planning to go about making your amends, to the dead?" -The Noose-APC
"Little angel go away
Come again some other day
The devil has my ear today
I'll never hear a word you say" Weak and Powerless - APC
|
|
 |
 |
|