Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/19 18:47:39
Subject: Lets talk about the BA and C:SM battleforces
|
 |
Paramount Plague Censer Bearer
|
So lets start off by listing the contents of each box and the price.
BA Battleforce
10 man tactical squad
5 man assault squad
5 man death company
1 rhino
Price: $100 (USD)
If not bundled.. (Going in order I listed)
37.25 + 29.75 + 33 + 33 = 133
So you save $33
C:SM Battleforce
10 man tactical squad
5 man combat squad
5 man assault squad
5 man scout squad
1 rhino
Price: $90
If not bundled..
37.25 + 22.50 + 29.75 + 22.50 + 33 = $145
You save $55
Huge difference in savings huh?
So lets say you buy a scout squad and combat squad boxes seperately and add them to the BA BF. 22.50+22.50 = 43.00. Your savings covered 33 of it so you shelled out $10 more.
$100 + 43 = $143
So lets say you buy a death company box with your C:SM BF. It is $33. Your savings covered all of it so you still have $22 saved.
$90 + 33 = $123
_______________-
So lets talk about how desirable some units are in the box, mainly I'm gonna talk about the scouts, but you can talk about whatever.
So I think people would agree that you don't want too many scouts in your collection but it is nice to at least have a 5 man squad or two laying around.
I think if one is starting blood angels, they might as well buy C:SM battleforce and a death company box. The models in those boxes are gonna be needed by newbies.
Where I think the BA battleforce is desirable is when a person is wanting to expand blood angels and doesn't want scouts/combat squad box. Lets face it, scouts are not really needed in a collection past ten and the combat squad box doesn't give you any special weapons. So all in all people with a lets say 2000 ptish collection will probably benefit more by purchasing the BA battleforce.
I feel I could have improved my reasoning but I think this post has a valid point and that many can see it, but I am leaving for college soon. Don't take this sample of my work as a representative piece that can indicate my future writing, because I'm only going to just a community college lol!
So in summary: C:SM BF = for beginners. BA BF = People expanding their already existing force.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/19 19:32:47
Subject: Lets talk about the BA and C:SM battleforces
|
 |
Ghost of Greed and Contempt
|
Also: why the hell would you want to pay more for blood angels? THEY AIN'T NO MATCH FOR KHORNE BEZERKERS!
*ahem*... sorry about that....
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/19 19:53:39
Subject: Lets talk about the BA and C:SM battleforces
|
 |
Sadistic Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
Ahem to me but Death Company have FNP, Furious Charge, Fearless, Relentless, and options for 20pts. Ahem, but Khorne Bezerkers are 21pts.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/19 20:16:47
Subject: Lets talk about the BA and C:SM battleforces
|
 |
Ferocious Black Templar Castellan
|
phantommaster wrote:Ahem to me but Death Company have FNP, Furious Charge, Fearless, Relentless, and options for 20pts. Ahem, but Khorne Bezerkers are 21pts.
Khorne Berzerkers can score and aren't completely balls-crazy (at least on table-top  ). Oh, and they're that good in a 4th edition Codex.
|
For thirteen years I had a dog with fur the darkest black. For thirteen years he was my friend, oh how I want him back. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/19 21:21:26
Subject: Lets talk about the BA and C:SM battleforces
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
Zerkers have Furious charge too, and +1 WS, along with being controllable. And were not subject to the power creep (meaning their points might drop below that of DC).
Back on topic: The BA battleforce is more of "SM battleforce with DC company and less junk". At least the SW stuff had mostly SW models.
|
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/19 22:10:10
Subject: Re:Lets talk about the BA and C:SM battleforces
|
 |
Paramount Plague Censer Bearer
|
I love how my thread was hi-jacked to Khorne Berserkers vs Death Company
This community (if you call it that) never ceases to amaze me! lol!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/19 23:14:08
Subject: Lets talk about the BA and C:SM battleforces
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
I'd say the whole point of a Battleforce is for people beginning and the BA Battleforce is no different IMHO.
Good, well reasoned post though. It may change across borders mind...
|
Enlist as a virtual Ultramarine! Click here for my Chaos Gate (PC) thread.
"It is the great irony of the Legiones Astartes: engineered to kill to achieve a victory of peace that they can then be no part of."
- Roboute Guilliman
"As I recall, your face was tortured. Imagine that - the Master of the Wolves, his ferocity twisted into grief. And yet you still carried out your duty. You always did what was asked of you. So loyal. So tenacious. Truly you were the attack dog of the Emperor. You took no pleasure in what you did. I knew that then, and I know it now. But all things change, my brother. I'm not the same as I was, and you're... well, let us not mention where you are now."
- Magnus the Red, to a statue of Leman Russ
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/20 01:13:29
Subject: Lets talk about the BA and C:SM battleforces
|
 |
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge
|
The only thing I'd change about your money value is the Combat Squad. The Combat Squad is one of the worst monetary values available, giving you half a tactical squad with no upgrade sprue. However, with the Blood Angels battleforce you will probably have enough bits from the Death Company box to kit out your sergeants, and maybe even other guys in the tactical and assault squads.
|
Check out my Youtube channel!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/20 01:24:03
Subject: Lets talk about the BA and C:SM battleforces
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
Theoretically you can make them all into DC with the bitz there are, or 10 Assault DCs and a Tact squad in Rhino.
|
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/20 01:25:13
Subject: Lets talk about the BA and C:SM battleforces
|
 |
Ruthless Rafkin
|
Again, it's a problem of utility.
These are all units that don't mesh well together. Either you're going to go all DoA or all mech; you generally don't see hybrid lists. Even with the savings, I don't see myself buying it.
|
-Loki- wrote:
40k is about slamming two slegdehammers together and hoping the other breaks first. Malifaux is about fighting with scalpels trying to hit select areas and hoping you connect more. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/20 06:51:43
Subject: Lets talk about the BA and C:SM battleforces
|
 |
Paramount Plague Censer Bearer
|
Valhallan42nd wrote:Again, it's a problem of utility.
These are all units that don't mesh well together. Either you're going to go all DoA or all mech; you generally don't see hybrid lists. Even with the savings, I don't see myself buying it.
Yes, it is kind of a bummer when it comes to them meshing.
C: SM you can put the 10 man tac squad in the rhino and run the assault marines behind them but then you have that out of place combat squad (5 marines). 5 dudes running around with bolters, bleh. Scouts can infiltrate so they have a use.
BA you can again run a jump pack ( DC or normal) squad behind the rhino but the other squad is left to jump from cover to cover or deepstrike.
Edit:
I will say this about the combat squad, they are useful if you are testing out special weapons, you can arm the 10 man with a flamer and rocket launcher while you can use the spare marines to hold the meltagun, special CCW, plasmagun.
Its not like magic where if one wants to test something, they can switch a few cards. 40k, it is desirable to have a variety in the equipment of your collection of models. Sure, one can proxy, but if given the option not to, why not take it? Heck, I even have a few plasma gunners lying around and I rarely use them in games.
We don't get a choice in what comes in the C: SM battleforce and that combat squad is out of place, but for a new person, a few extra marines lying around is never a bad thing.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2011/01/20 06:57:49
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/20 16:40:38
Subject: Lets talk about the BA and C:SM battleforces
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Valhallan42nd wrote:Again, it's a problem of utility.
These are all units that don't mesh well together. Either you're going to go all DoA or all mech; you generally don't see hybrid lists. Even with the savings, I don't see myself buying it.
I think the problem here is the almost assumption that everyone plays competitively, which simply isn't the case. The great thing about the BA Codex (which I'm otherwise happy to criticise!) is the variety of builds it allows.
|
Enlist as a virtual Ultramarine! Click here for my Chaos Gate (PC) thread.
"It is the great irony of the Legiones Astartes: engineered to kill to achieve a victory of peace that they can then be no part of."
- Roboute Guilliman
"As I recall, your face was tortured. Imagine that - the Master of the Wolves, his ferocity twisted into grief. And yet you still carried out your duty. You always did what was asked of you. So loyal. So tenacious. Truly you were the attack dog of the Emperor. You took no pleasure in what you did. I knew that then, and I know it now. But all things change, my brother. I'm not the same as I was, and you're... well, let us not mention where you are now."
- Magnus the Red, to a statue of Leman Russ
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/20 17:52:09
Subject: Lets talk about the BA and C:SM battleforces
|
 |
Ruthless Rafkin
|
Just Dave wrote:Valhallan42nd wrote:Again, it's a problem of utility.
These are all units that don't mesh well together. Either you're going to go all DoA or all mech; you generally don't see hybrid lists. Even with the savings, I don't see myself buying it.
I think the problem here is the almost assumption that everyone plays competitively, which simply isn't the case. The great thing about the BA Codex (which I'm otherwise happy to criticise!) is the variety of builds it allows.
I'm not talking about its utility for a casual player (I have tac squads for my Flesh Tearers, even!), I was talking about it from the perspective of "is it useful for a competitive player?" If you were building two different blood angel armies at once, yes. Otherwise, not so much.
Casual players might find some utility in this. A free rhino is a free rhino.
|
-Loki- wrote:
40k is about slamming two slegdehammers together and hoping the other breaks first. Malifaux is about fighting with scalpels trying to hit select areas and hoping you connect more. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/20 18:18:32
Subject: Lets talk about the BA and C:SM battleforces
|
 |
Annoyed Blood Angel Devastator
|
Just Dave wrote:Valhallan42nd wrote:Again, it's a problem of utility.
These are all units that don't mesh well together. Either you're going to go all DoA or all mech; you generally don't see hybrid lists. Even with the savings, I don't see myself buying it.
I think the problem here is the almost assumption that everyone plays competitively, which simply isn't the case. The great thing about the BA Codex (which I'm otherwise happy to criticise!) is the variety of builds it allows.
+1
I've mentioned it before but that is something that is commonly done. Some people enjoy having one of every time of unit a codex can have then mixing and matching their army lists for a new variety every game. In this case I once again will say that the box is a good deal. The argument of the C: SM kit is good in that it almost gives the same load out for cheaper, however lets not overlook the amazing kit that is the Death Company Box and its posibilites to gear out the whole Battle Force in blood drop bits. That is assuming that the DC that come in the BattleForce are identicle to the standalone $33 dollar box.
|
3rd Edition Blood Angel player, brought back to the game...
2500 pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/20 18:29:17
Subject: Lets talk about the BA and C:SM battleforces
|
 |
Napoleonics Obsesser
|
The BA battleforce is the biggest piece of crap I've ever seen
They couldn't give you a baal predator instead of a gakky rhino? If you're using assault guys, why the gak would you even think of rhinos? The best units in the codex are jump infantry!
Seriously, I'll still argue that the CSM battleforce is the best bang for your buck:
Rhino, 15 marines, possessed, berserkers
33+35+25+25+25(roughly, since you get 2/3 the berserkers)=143$
Battleforce- 90$
You save 53$ But of course, you're left with an incomplete berserker unit, worthless possessed marines, and five random guys (that could be used for plague marines, I guess).... So really, you're paying 20 bucks for a bunch of bits that are great
|
If only ZUN!bar were here... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/20 19:25:58
Subject: Lets talk about the BA and C:SM battleforces
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Samus_aran115 wrote:The BA battleforce is the biggest piece of crap I've ever seen
They couldn't give you a baal predator instead of a gakky rhino? If you're using assault guys, why the gak would you even think of rhinos? The best units in the codex are jump infantry!
Seriously, I'll still argue that the CSM battleforce is the best bang for your buck:
Rhino, 15 marines, possessed, berserkers
33+35+25+25+25(roughly, since you get 2/3 the berserkers)=143$
Battleforce- 90$
You save 53$ But of course, you're left with an incomplete berserker unit, worthless possessed marines, and five random guys (that could be used for plague marines, I guess).... So really, you're paying 20 bucks for a bunch of bits that are great 
I can't recall any Battleforce coming with something possessing a stat-line or Heavy Support choice like the Baal since the Tyranid Carnifex battleforce. I can understand BA players desiring something better than Tacs/Rhinos (which still aren't a BAD unit), but to want something akin to a Baal is too much.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, I know if I played Blood Angels I'd use a Tactical Squad or 2. They're reliable, scoring and thematic. Ultimately they're not a GOOD choice, but they're not bad and they are the heart of almost all Space Marine chapters.
Beserkers actually come in their 'magic' number and possessed are useful for conversions. It's not perfect but as you said, it's the best out there, except Necrons IMHO.
|
Enlist as a virtual Ultramarine! Click here for my Chaos Gate (PC) thread.
"It is the great irony of the Legiones Astartes: engineered to kill to achieve a victory of peace that they can then be no part of."
- Roboute Guilliman
"As I recall, your face was tortured. Imagine that - the Master of the Wolves, his ferocity twisted into grief. And yet you still carried out your duty. You always did what was asked of you. So loyal. So tenacious. Truly you were the attack dog of the Emperor. You took no pleasure in what you did. I knew that then, and I know it now. But all things change, my brother. I'm not the same as I was, and you're... well, let us not mention where you are now."
- Magnus the Red, to a statue of Leman Russ
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/20 20:11:44
Subject: Re:Lets talk about the BA and C:SM battleforces
|
 |
Wraith
|
BA should have Tacticals. They always have.
All Assault is an option that they excel at, but that isn't their schtick.
As I see it you get 3 good Troop choices and a transport in that box.
Raven Guard are the All Assault all the time guys.
|
Bam, said the lady!
DR:70S+GM++B+I+Pw40k09/f++D++A(WTF)/hWD153R+++T(S)DM++++
Dakka, what is good in life?
To crush other websites,
See their user posts driven before you,
And hear the lamentation of the newbs.
-Frazzled-10/22/09 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/20 20:22:44
Subject: Lets talk about the BA and C:SM battleforces
|
 |
Napoleonics Obsesser
|
Yeah, really. The necron one is quite literally an army in a box, except for a momlith and a lord with an orb
Oh, trust me, I was more than happy to get those wicked possessed heads  I'm not complaining about it at all, since I can't really think of anything better to put in it
|
If only ZUN!bar were here... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/21 07:59:38
Subject: Lets talk about the BA and C:SM battleforces
|
 |
Ultramarine Land Raider Pilot on Cruise Control
|
I find the Combat Squad in the CSM box useful for adding to a Dev box.
|
If you can keep your head, while all about you are losing their's, then you have probably completely misunderstood the situation!
6,000pts
5,500pts
3,500pts
2,500pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/21 14:56:36
Subject: Re:Lets talk about the BA and C:SM battleforces
|
 |
Annoyed Blood Angel Devastator
|
(I think the hijack was some confusion over C:SM and CSM)
More to your point, I completely agree. The vanilla SM battleforce is not very glitzy, but it gives you good bang for your buck and would be functional for a BA starting player. Given that most BA lists I see don't even use DC, the only compelling reason I could see for getting the BA battleforce instead of the vanilla SM one is if you built it as a blinged-up 10 man assault squad by kitbashing the assaults + DC together.
As a player with a fledgling BA army, I was disappointed, and doubt I'll be buying one.
|
“Who is to judge what is right and what is wrong? Great and powerful foes surround us; unknown miscreants gnaw at us from within. We are threatened with total annihilation. In days such as these we can afford no luxury of morality.” |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/01/21 16:07:11
Subject: Lets talk about the BA and C:SM battleforces
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
Truthfully I'm somewhat glad that the battle Force included the Death Company, as the local FLGS sells open box items from battle forces at a bigger discount. At least this means that the cost of DC will go down now at that place.
|
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
 |
 |
|