Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I particularly like the Soviet anthem at the end.

The original video is sickeningly propagandistic.

So buying stuff is bad, but what do I do with my money then?

halonachos wrote:So buying stuff is bad, but what do I do with my money then?

I think, per the four part series, the only thing you can responsibly do is dig a hole, n in it, and cut your wrists.

halonachos wrote:So buying stuff is bad, but what do I do with my money then?

You can send it to me and I will dispose of it safely.

What level of US educational attainment is that video aimed at?

Kilkrazy wrote:

halonachos wrote:So buying stuff is bad, but what do I do with my money then?

You can send it to me and I will dispose of it safely.

What level of US educational attainment is that video aimed at?

Early elementary although its been shown in some Jr. High's and High schools. Evidently it was shown in a class at my boy's sister high school to massive derision at a level only sarcastic teenagers can deliver. After calls from parents, the teacher and principal had a surprise call from school board higher ups and it was pulled.

It did seem like an elementary level film, that's why I was surprised to see it being criticised for not covering LD50 and such like.

It's like criticizing "John and Jane" books for poor character development and insufficient use of allegory.

Definitely unsuitable for A Level students. I'm not surprised it was pulled.

Kilkrazy wrote:It did seem like an elementary level film, that's why I was surprised to see it being criticised for not covering LD50 and such like.

It's like criticizing "John and Jane" books for poor character development and insufficient use of allegory.

Definitely unsuitable for A Level students. I'm not surprised it was pulled.

itsd propaganda and not accurate, at all...

This seems to assume less that kids aren't ready for a nuanced argument and more that they are brain damaged.

Ahtman wrote:This seems to assume less that kids aren't ready for a nuanced argument and more that they are brain damaged.

It isn't just patronising, its total bs.

Listening to that, I'm amazed at the constant extension of life expectancy.

Her book is awful, may I add.

Wait she has a book?

Frazzled, I wish to report your thread as spam.

Please lock at your earliest convenience.

Frazzled wrote:Wait she has a book?

Oh yeah. She has a website, talking tours, book signings, etc.

She's a eco-hippie who needs to shut the gak up.

/opinion

The Story of Stuffing

That would be a good film.

Kilkrazy wrote:The Story of Stuffing

That would be a good film.

The Story of Steppin'.

Now that would be a-





Oh...

WarOne wrote:

Kilkrazy wrote:The Story of Stuffing

That would be a good film.

The Story of Steppin'.

Now that would be a-





Oh...

The story of seven, that would be a goo-

WarOne wrote:Frazzled, I wish to report your thread as spam.

Please lock at your earliest convenience.

Request denied. Rodney the Shanker will be around presently to bite your ankles until you repent.

Frazzled wrote:

WarOne wrote:Frazzled, I wish to report your thread as spam.

Please lock at your earliest convenience.

Request denied. Rodney the Shanker will be around presently to bite your ankles until you repent.

Wow Frazz your dachshunds are so thin compared to mine. Mine is so overweight

ON topic: I knew it was propaganda going in and i was still surprised