Switch Theme:

IG Vets: Grenadiers, yes or no?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Uhlan





Colorado, USA

Dakka,

So I run a Heavy Mechanized infantry list (Grenadier Vets+Chimeras) for fluff reasons, but on a more competitive level what do you all think about the Grenadiers doctrine for veterans?

I won't post the points it costs (against Dakka rules, I think?), but it's roughly half the squad's cost for 4+ saves on 10 models. The ability to not get boned by a single flamer seems like a good buy to me, as a ton of weapons are AP5 in my experience. The way I see it, it offers over double the survivability (especially on Gets Hot! rolls). I generally put grenadier vets inside of Chimeras as well, hoping for serious survivability.

Grenadiers, yay or nay?

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/04/05 05:41:27


 
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: