iproxtaco wrote:Whilst I have no real problems with the Bloodtide story, a change to the first couple of sentences would make it better for everyone. Instead of saying 'the Grey Knights first act is to turn their blades upon the surviving Sisters of Battle' it would be better if it had said 'Knowing the Bloodtide to be particularly potent Daemonic force, the Grey Knights look for a means to protect themselves further from the corruption of the Goreflood. Recognising the Grey Knights to be the Emperors chosen, the Sisters offer themselves as willing sacrifices. The innocent blood thus......'. I'm certainly not going to start baying for Matt Wards blood over this story, as I have no problems with it, but I think a little bit more forethought should have gone into thinking about how certain parts of the community would take it.
Thanks for posting this, as it sums up my feelings exactly. I don't have a problem with the
GKs using blood, I have a problem with HOW they did it.
And people can call me a nerdrager, but when I see poorly written fluff, I call it bad fluff.
And it's not as if Ward is alone in this. I think the quality of fluff in general has declined. Goto, Lightner and others have consistently published, in my opinion, very bad fluff.
Abnett, "Sandy Mitchell" and others,
OTOH, have published very good fluff. So it's not all bad.
It's not as if there has'nt been bad fluff before. Eye of Terror may have been the worst
40k novel ever published. Although the ending with the fallen dark angel is pretty good, it does'nt save the rest of the book.
grmpf wrote:why Ward's fluff is awful : the lack of forethought and polishing in many of his stories. Every one of the pieces discuted and hated by people COULD have been improved and made mostly good or acceptable. But it wasn't done. So, they are awful and lacks distinction and polishing
Echo this as well, and I will now step off my