Switch Theme:

Non-GW players - I'm confused?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Bonkers Buggy Driver with Rockets





Black Country

Amongst all the recent anti-GW sentiment recently there have been a few general comments that have intrigued me. Mainly players who are switching to other minis or ones that no longer buy GW minis anyway.

If you're one of these players maybe you can just shed some light on your gaming for me; I have been role-playing and board gaming for 20+ years but only came into miniature painting and wargaming approx. 15 months ago so am still finding my feet with this aspect of the hobby.

Do you play other none-GW games instead?
Do you Proxy/Counts As other minis for GW games?

And please, this is a genuine question and I don't want to open up a Proxy debate. I'm asking because everyone at my club plays pretty much WYSIWYG, so when playing say 40K they use 40K minis. It's not a club rule or anything, people just do.

And I have looked at other sites, dozens upon dozens of them! It seems easy enough to use other minis for say Fantasy Battles but for 40K that is a lot harder to find like-for-like alternatives. And while there are some really good miniatures from other companies I've not seen any real alternatives that would really be that much cheaper for 40K.

Cheers.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/05/29 10:03:25


Apologies for talking positively about games I enjoy.
Orkz Rokk!!!  
   
Made in us
Lord of the Fleet





Texas

40k is a bit of a doozy outside of Imperial Guard unless you get really creative. Honestly if you love 40k for its aesthetics best option is to use discount stores or 2nd hand miniatures

Btw I think Non is the prefix you're looking for, not none

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/05/29 01:02:31


 
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran





I've never cared if people proxy. My original group allowed skellingtons to be proxies for just about anything.

"Worglock is not wrong..." - Legoburner

Total Finecast Models purchased: 30.
Models with issues: 2
Models made good by Customer Service: 2
Finecast is... Fine... Get over it. 
   
Made in gb
Noble of the Alter Kindred




United Kingdom

Honestly if you love 40k for its ascetics


Other games systems may have holy men too!

That should be aesthetics Kenshin

edit your post and I will do likewise

And that should be skeletons Worglock

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/05/29 00:44:24


 
   
Made in us
Lord of the Fleet





Texas

Dang, stupid firefox autospell!

Anyways yes other games have holy men, aliens, and etc but I think the point OP is making is that money wise you dont save all that much sans character/vehicle models for models with 40k aesthetics

 
   
Made in au
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests






Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.

Ugavine wrote:Do you play other none-GW games instead?
Do you Proxy/Counts As other minis for GW games?


I have an Adeptus Mechanicus army that most consists of models from this range. I use them in 40K, and I use them in the various 40K RPG's. I also have groups of minis from Antenociti's Workshop, Scibor - even Ex Illis before they died - all used in a 40K context.

The only things I don't use with 40K related games are my BattleTech miniatures. They're a different scale, are on hex-bases, and just look weird when put with 40K stuff.

Industrial Insanity - My Terrain Blog
"GW really needs to understand 'Less is more' when it comes to AoS." - Wha-Mu-077

 
   
Made in us
Paingiver







--Warning: the following is a highly opinionated post--
I haven't bought a gw model since early 4th edition and haven't played their games in longer than that.
To tell you the truth its the games and rules that get to me way more than the prices. Since I spread my wings a bit and tried other systems I have come to the conclusion that 40k (3rd and 4th editions at least, i haven't read 5th) is one of the WORST rule sets on the market. I was never into fantasy so I cannot comment on that, the armies and aesthetics don't grab me.
I actually like most of gw's newer models and forge world has some superb stuff.
Core gameplay aside, GW games are very bad in their army selection rules. You need to field way too many bland vanilla troops and a good chunk of points on transports to not be squashed leaving fewer points for the cool looking stuff that got you into the army in the first place. The further restrictions of rare units/force organization mean even if you have points you can only play three of your six cool elites options. $40 for ten nice looking models isn't even that bad a price, the problem is the games are set up to make you need like, eighty of them.

I am fortunate I have found other model ranges I enjoy as much as gw's 40k models and that I have been able to trade off and sell almost all of my old gw stuff, but even if i had not you can be sure I would be playing infinity with my friends using tau models or using some alternate homebrew rules with my 40k models -in fact, my warmachine cygnar trenchers are steel legion with the eagles filed off. I honestly think we are in a golden age of gaming and I think it's a waste to pay for anything or play any game you aren't satisfied with.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/05/29 03:13:50


   
Made in jp
[MOD]
Anti-piracy Officer






Somewhere in south-central England.

As a wargamer for 30+ years I have played many non-GW games with non-GW models (by definition since the GW stuff didn't exist when I started).

I am very happy to play non-GW games. The GW rules are limited in a number of aspects (command and control, morale, turn sequence, realism, for example) and while fun do not scratch all the itches of a would be tabletop general.

I am also happy to play 40K with a well done set of proxy models. I am building an IG army which will be entirely non-GW models. I am doing this because I don't like the GW models.

I would also be happy to use appropriate GW models in other games. Tau make pretty good generic humanoid aliens, for instance.

I'm writing a load of fiction. My latest story starts here... This is the index of all the stories...

We're not very big on official rules. Rules lead to people looking for loopholes. What's here is about it. 
   
Made in au
Anti-Armour Swiss Guard






Newcastle, OZ

Kilkrazy wrote:As a wargamer for 30+ years I have played many non-GW games with non-GW models (by definition since the GW stuff didn't exist when I started).

I am very happy to play non-GW games. The GW rules are limited in a number of aspects (command and control, morale, turn sequence, realism, for example) and while fun do not scratch all the itches of a would be tabletop general.

I am also happy to play 40K with a well done set of proxy models. I am building an IG army which will be entirely non-GW models. I am doing this because I don't like the GW models.

I would also be happy to use appropriate GW models in other games. Tau make pretty good generic humanoid aliens, for instance.


I'm like him ^.

Except it's 27 or so years for me.

I've always had another game (not GW) that I've played in the same time frame - GW have never been the be-all and end-all of gaming for me.
There are many other games companies out there, and quite a few have some very nice and tight game rules to go with their models.
Some even don't care whose models you use in the games.

I have an IG army that is 80% non-GW models (I don't really like most of their infantry, and their tanks are firmly stuck in the sucky 90s, alongside grunge music (which I also don't like).
IG are easy to substitute for - humans are still humans, the tanks are armoured slabs with treads. ANYTHING that has those characteristics can fit in.

The big divide tends to be with us older RT edition 40kers. We tend to be more flexible in our outlook because back in those days, we didn't HAVE the same amount of product that the current game has, and HAD to use something else converted for the purpose. Hell, the Vindicator, Whirlwind, and early SoB concept vehicles were ALL taken from Rhino kitbashes.






I'm OVER 50 (and so far over everyone's BS, too).
Old enough to know better, young enough to not give a ****.

That is not dead which can eternal lie ...

... and yet, with strange aeons, even death may die.
 
   
Made in gb
Bonkers Buggy Driver with Rockets





Black Country

Cheers for the feedback.

I do play other games, just not other wargames at the moment, and it's nice seeing how other play. Thanks.

H.B.M.C. wrote:I have an Adeptus Mechanicus army that most consists of models from this range.

And cheers for that link, of all the sites I've looked at that's the first time I've see that one. Very nice looking models, I might try some of those for my planned Legion of the Damned army.

Apologies for talking positively about games I enjoy.
Orkz Rokk!!!  
   
Made in au
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests






Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.

Microart is a good place. A lot of people here have ordered from them. Great looking models, and they're one of the few outfits making really good not-Adeptus Mechanicus models.

Industrial Insanity - My Terrain Blog
"GW really needs to understand 'Less is more' when it comes to AoS." - Wha-Mu-077

 
   
Made in au
Member of a Lodge? I Can't Say



Australia

Dais wrote:Core gameplay aside, GW games are very bad in their army selection rules. You need to field way too many bland vanilla troops and a good chunk of points on transports to not be squashed leaving fewer points for the cool looking stuff that got you into the army in the first place. The further restrictions of rare units/force organization mean even if you have points you can only play three of your six cool elites options. $40 for ten nice looking models isn't even that bad a price, the problem is the games are set up to make you need like, eighty of them.
My sentiments exactly. When I used to follow the GW hobby, I’d be divided between collecting models I like and building a playable army (whilst trying to make do with the abysmal quality of rules in the CSM codex). The mech nature of 5th edition has really hurt my wallet and given me less enjoyment than what I experienced during third edition (the quality of rules have been a downhill slide IMO). At the end of the day, I’m quite glad that I’ve left GW for PP.

I regards to the original post, I have to agree that anything short of IG is hard to proxy/convert for 40k. Some of the Warmachine warjacks have some really good conversion potential (as mechanicus/dark mechanicus style units). When I was still collecting GW, I had an idea to convert Blood Slaughterers (a type of khornate dreadnaught for those who do not know), using Cryx warjacks. It’d be hard to proxy the majority of an entire army using third party miniatures but you’ll have relative success on a small scale conversion level.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/05/30 00:34:13


H.B.M.C. wrote: Goood! Goooood!

Your hate has made you powerful. Now take your Privateer Press tape measure and strike me down with all your hatred and your journey to the dark side will be complete!!!


 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka






Ugavine wrote:Amongst all the recent anti-GW sentiment recently there have been a few general comments that have intrigued me. Mainly players who are switching to other minis or ones that no longer buy GW minis anyway.

If you're one of these players maybe you can just shed some light on your gaming for me; I have been role-playing and board gaming for 20+ years but only came into miniature painting and wargaming approx. 15 months ago so am still finding my feet with this aspect of the hobby.

Do you play other none-GW games instead?
Do you Proxy/Counts As other minis for GW games?

And please, this is a genuine question and I don't want to open up a Proxy debate. I'm asking because everyone at my club plays pretty much WYSIWYG, so when playing say 40K they use 40K minis. It's not a club rule or anything, people just do.

And I have looked at other sites, dozens upon dozens of them! It seems easy enough to use other minis for say Fantasy Battles but for 40K that is a lot harder to find like-for-like alternatives. And while there are some really good miniatures from other companies I've not seen any real alternatives that would really be that much cheaper for 40K.

Cheers.


As much as i !@#$ about GW, I was a dyed in the wool kool aid kid of the first degree for over 10 or so years, and then off and on for another .... 20 or so?( !@#$ has it been THAT LONG?!?!?) So I've seen some things, man..... AWFUL things, amazing things, and some other stuff? Just in between.

The thing about GW's games used to be that they had a variety and a pretty good selection of accessable modeling materials and miniature lines. They had something for everyone, and the other lines inter related within the same game systems, as time went by though, and bottom line became the goal, that process and the integrity of the systems have broken down to the point of chocolate, Vanilla, or strawberry. No tutty fruity, no butter brickal, or any other 31 flavors of gaming. HENCE, you see the guy with the deer in the headlight look when you start talking about Adeptus Mechanicus, and then start talking about how you played Apocalypse sized games on a 4 by 4 table.
As that process continued, other companies out there have ALWAYS been there. As time marched forward, and focus stayed on GW GW GW, these other companies have stayed the course, and if they did go under, they were picked upby someone else simply because of the tried and true method of stayablility.

These so called "Alternatives" were also some of GW's rivals in the attention of gamers. So when you have maybe 10 kids that are true dyed in the wool fantasy, 40k, or specialist games plaers, you have maybe twice that amount scattered about far and wide, but arn't given the attention, based solely on the availablilty, the store access, or even the tital access themselves.

Short story long, if I have a second rate game/ comic store that has maybe three boxes of marines, and a blister pack of dwarfs, then the access to a playing table, then your really not given the access to variety, just access to GW, the great and powerful...space marine and dwarf..., or the distribution of anything other then whatever that guy wants to sell. In the other hand, we see top notch comic and game stores that have access to 30-50 different games and companies, that will expand the horizens of more then the ones that only play with the sand box game of the one trick pony.

As to the cheaper...

Cheap isn't just about price. Access, affordability, buy in and time cost, etc.etc.etc. Can you pick up and play the game in five minutes after you learn the rules? Do I have to buy in with a second morgage? How many people in my area play this game? and other questiuons come to mind when we talk about the different aspects that concern gamers.

All and all it boils down to - Do me and my friends want to spend our time on this game, and how much effort do we put into it, as opposed to how much fun we're going to get out of it.?

As to GW?

The proxy issue was never even an issue, until maybe 2 years or so ago, when some assclown decided out of the blue that it was verboten. As a matter of fact, I have a RT book here that still has the plans on how to make a hover tank out of a soap bottle. GW's figures have evolved to the point though, that they are thier own entity. You really CAN'T use them in other games.

Some too big, others, too flashy, others still are specific only to THAT game, or THIS game.

Back in the day, a figure was a figure, was a figure. NOW? EVERYONES system is specific, and theres a stretch between companies and thier products.

To the "Other Games" issue...

It boils down to getting up to the top of the ladder at the pool, and either wanting to jump in, or wanting to climb back down, because you don't want to fall into the pool. Your getting wet, one way or the other, so it just depends on how you want to do it- You can jump, or go climb in the kiddie end and walk in. (I/E- Spending that money... you can either spend it on something new, or something that is tame and you already know about. either way, that money is geting spent.)

You do not play the other games with GW stuff. If anything, GW takes a vacation. Anyone pulls out a Space Marine, gets the ragging and the marine goes away. You pull out a platoon of U.S. marines, and a bunch of Insurgents, or Cold Ones, or your aliens and spacemen, or the evil genius and his henchmen and the league of extrodinary gentlemen.

If anything, it's about just getting together with your mates, and a beer, or beverage, and trying something different and maybe trying something new.

You don't like it, you go get something else, or go back to your familiar kiddie pool. If not, you go get your pirates, cowboys, and ninjas- and start something else, and GW takes a night, and cowpokes and Katana's get thier own night.

Most say they are going to Warmahordes, or FOW, or whatever. And thats thier parogative, but personally?

Lifes too short to !@#$ around. I get a few minis from here and there, go get a system or two, and try it. If I like it, I get more, if not, it either goes in the closet, where, later I will, 10 to 1, find someone else that plays it. THEN- I can play too, and or sell them to them, or I just move on out to something else.
The thing to do?

Just try something new.

Get your own game of your choice, get a couple of minis, and try it.

Minis, contrary to popular belief, are not that expensive. GW has only programed the world into thinking that they are. (Those of us in the know, know better.)

$20.00 to get your foot wet. You don't like it, you can pitch them off on someone else, or just sit on them. No blood, no foul.

WHEREAS- You drop $200 on a army, your stuck with it. You HATE the thing, BUT... you picked it because the kool aid kids told you it was a giant killer.

20 bucks for 2 teams, a book, maybe? 200+ bucks for 1 army.

Branching out to skermish games? Yeah, thats 200 bucks on 10 or so games if you so choose. OR.... Nothing. you get 180.00 laft to fool around with.

At the end of the day, its about what you want to do with your limited free time... for fun. And with the smorgasborgs out there, why stick with cold french fries?



At Games Workshop, we believe that how you behave does matter. We believe this so strongly that we have written it down in the Games Workshop Book. There is a section in the book where we talk about the values we expect all staff to demonstrate in their working lives. These values are Lawyers, Guns and Money. 
   
 
Forum Index » Dakka Discussions
Go to: