Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Hey guys, wondering, for a WoC army, would it be better to have an un-divided WoC army. Like, Extra Hand Weapon Khorne Warriors, Shield Tzeetch, Shield Nurgle, and Halberd Slannesh, and a block of undivided Marauders, and then knights, led by Undivided lord, Tzeetch sorcerer, and Khornate BSB?

I know since this is unfocused, it may have some difficulty, but would it bring balance?

I would say halberd on khorne warriors.
MoS is not really worth it you get the same thing out of mok or the rage banner you pay a little more but you get an extra attack and the immune to fear and terror.

Here is what I think you save yourself what maybe 100 points ish depending on how many points you play and those 100 points are not going to get you the extra something something the mark gives you.

I dono how I feel about a bsb with mok I would be compelled to put him on a jugger and that would put him away from the units that need the reroll possibly.

On a sorcerer thats another story you get different lores so that could make you take him without a mark
Is It worth it not really IMO there just isnt much to gain out of it other than for a sorcerer.

MoS gives Immune to Panic, Fear and Terror (not Immune to Psych entirely though). Frenzy just gives you the extra attack on top of that and ItP proper, until you lose it.

I am not a big fan of MoS, but it isn't terrible, just not as good as MoK or MoT.

Commisar Von Humps wrote:Hey guys, wondering, for a WoC army, would it be better to have an un-divided WoC army. Like, Extra Hand Weapon Khorne Warriors, Shield Tzeetch, Shield Nurgle, and Halberd Slannesh, and a block of undivided Marauders, and then knights, led by Undivided lord, Tzeetch sorcerer, and Khornate BSB?

I know since this is unfocused, it may have some difficulty, but would it bring balance?

I have had some success playing Undiv WoC . I have found the lists to have a answer to just about any situation if the dice permits. Of course a
fanatical Khorne player will say me charging and slaying is a answer to everything.

Extra hand weapon on Khorne warriors = depending on how your ranked . I normally don't see to much of a advantage. I like my Khorne warriors with Halbards and shields (for range saves)

Sheild Nurgle - I have grown very found of the plauged Boys . They tend to tie stuff up and stay there. Its amazing how far -1 ws can go some times.

TZ shields - 100 % I would rank them no other way.

Slanesh Hal = Sure

Mauraders = I just love them frenzied by khorne with Flails . Seems to work for me.

TZ Sorc = Sure

Khornate BSB = Depends , I have used one on a Juggy running around with sucess , But at the same time I have had exalted TZ with wards of the wazooo with sucess. I would say it depends on your entire composition.

Hope this helps

Mok with halberds are great no complaints.

Mot is well I'm a follower all tz all the way (minus the hellcannon.

Mos sorta well it's not like they are that amazing fear and terror ok but if you have a frenzied unit they ignore that and panic is re rollable so mok is a little more expensive but you get the extra attack as well as a not lame god.

Mon well it helps aganst gun lines for sure but not against ws 4 and 5 it dosnt do anything sadly same goes for ws7 and up now if you got regen with that may make it worth it.

Marauder horde mok with gw is amazing.

Mot bsb super nasty and awesome.